anna.banana
New member
Hey all
I'd like to join too... looking forward to a new year and a big challenge!
Ana
I'd like to join too... looking forward to a new year and a big challenge!
Ana
when it's 5 pm in NYC what time is it in England...
/googles manically
9pm London time
when it's 5 pm in NYC what time is it in England...
/googles manically
9pm London time
I think points are great, but it just might be easier to keep track if the points are small numbers, and not derivative towards the weight, because for exampleMaybe you could have the exercise portion coincide with the person's "100-club". i.e. if you weigh 300-400lbs, your goal for biking would be like 6 miles (I know that I usually do 3-4 miles at around 320, so 6 miles would be pushing it for me). If you weigh 200-300lbs, make it 8 miles? 100-200lbs 10 miles? Does that seem reasonable? I am less aware of what is appropriate for the lower weights activity-wise because I haven't really been there ... ever, ha.
Ooh, or if you want to do it as a points system, take the number of miles multiplied by the person's weight.
So: (Miles x Weight)
Example: (6 miles x 318.2)= 1909pts.
(6 miles x 243.7)= 1462pts.
I'm not sure if this is a fair system, (mostly because I'm terrible at math) but if we could do something similar to this, it would probably be great.
You could really do it with whatever, including push-ups or other calisthenics.
20 push ups x 318lbs = 6360pts.
20 push ups x 215lbs = 4300pts.
If you want to simplify the numbers, just multiply your weight by .01 before plugging it into the equation:
318 x .01 = 3.18; 20 push ups x 3.18 = 63.6
There may be problems with this system, if anyone sees a problem let me know, I tend to get an idea and then I get blinders on so it is hard for me to see flawed logic unless it is pointed out.
I think points are great, but it just might be easier to keep track if the points are small numbers, and not derivative towards the weight, because for example
1) The higher the weight-the more points you have---
2) The lower the weight -the less points you have ---
...the baby issue being : @ the end of the challenge...which is it based on?
1) the higher amount of points wins?
2) the lower amount wins?
...when it's based according to pounds, I don't see how either one will be motivated to work harder, because if the "higher" amount of points wins, obviously the person weighing more will have an advantage over the lower weighing person. And if the points are winning towards the "least" amount of points, the heavier weighing person would have less motivation to work harder, considering the more exercise, the more points, the farther away from having "less" points to be able to win. The lower weighing person will get more frustrated as they have to work double time to accumulate the "higher" amount of points, in case the winning is having "more" points.
...get my drift?
...I think that points is Great, just maybe we can give a "point" for each completed task daily, (ex: drink water= 1 point, 30 mins exercise = 1 point, weight lifting 30 mins = 1 pt., counting calories = 1 point, and so on)===making a total of points for the day like 5 or something. This I think would be easier to count and keep track of at the end of the week, and day.
Just a thought !
hahah...You are so cute!!!...Of course you will be able to do a "real" pushup! !You make a good point about motivation, Alta. Perhaps I was trying to make things too complicated. It is difficult to make any number of tasks or activities be an even playing field for people of different abilities, weights, and activity levels.
My point was simply that for something like push-ups, it is much more physical work to do the same amount of push-ups as someone who weighs less. Same with running, sit-ups, and many other measurable activities.
I am going to be competing with myself through this whole challenge, so however it gets measured doesn't matter to me. I know that I probably can't even do a single "REAL" push-up anyway, lol
Maybe you could have the exercise portion coincide with the person's "100-club". i.e. if you weigh 300-400lbs, your goal for biking would be like 6 miles (I know that I usually do 3-4 miles at around 320, so 6 miles would be pushing it for me). If you weigh 200-300lbs, make it 8 miles? 100-200lbs 10 miles? Does that seem reasonable? I am less aware of what is appropriate for the lower weights activity-wise because I haven't really been there ... ever, ha.
Ooh, or if you want to do it as a points system, take the number of miles multiplied by the person's weight.
So: (Miles x Weight)
Example: (6 miles x 318.2)= 1909pts.
(6 miles x 243.7)= 1462pts.
I'm not sure if this is a fair system, (mostly because I'm terrible at math) but if we could do something similar to this, it would probably be great.
You could really do it with whatever, including push-ups or other calisthenics.
20 push ups x 318lbs = 6360pts.
20 push ups x 215lbs = 4300pts.
If you want to simplify the numbers, just multiply your weight by .01 before plugging it into the equation:
318 x .01 = 3.18; 20 push ups x 3.18 = 63.6
There may be problems with this system, if anyone sees a problem let me know, I tend to get an idea and then I get blinders on so it is hard for me to see flawed logic unless it is pointed out.