I am Obama supporter. My concerns are with the economy and the war. Considering McCain will bring no change and has publicly made a fool himself with regard to domestic and foreign policy I think it's a pretty easy decision.
I can see how it can become very easy to be caught up with all the crap spewed out by the cable news networks but in reality they are not biased. Making issues out of something that has nothing to do with the average Americans everyday life (see Gay Marriage).FoxNews gets it pretty bad but they are all the same. Those pundits who actually questioned the intelligence about the invasion of Iraq were canned and conservative hosts were put in place (see Ashleigh Banfield).
Now with regard to everyone saying Obama is just a great speaker and nothing else. I'm assuming you only hear his stump speeches. Those speeches aren't intended to go into deep detail of the issues. That's what the debates were for and I'm pretty sure he covered all the issues there in great detail.
And with regard to experience. The 2 candidates are senators. Both have never balanced a budget. Their experience I would say is pretty even. I don't believe voting experience is really a great thing to judge a President, it really only shows what his true intentions as a Democrat or a Republican is. I mean if we went by voting experience for experience I think Big bob Byrd would be scoring a few more points here.
But this all the political BS that has been floating around in my head. Where he wins my vote is on the issues (also I'm a Yellow Dog Democrat ha!).
On health care:
- health care for those with pre-existing conditions
- mandatory health care for children
- subsidizing costs for those that cannot afford health care
Education:
- Moving towards the concept of college education as a 'right'
- $4,000 tuition credit for college students
- Increase investments in childhood education, increase funding
National security:
- withdraw troops from Iraq over a set timeline after discussing situation with advisors / military advisors
- End communication sanctions with Iran and Cuba, negotiate with these countries
- Build the military, focus military towards other sources of terrorism than Iraq
Immigration:
- offer a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants
- Reform immigration procedures
Sorry for the long post/rant.
Amen. That's why he's getting my vote. I started out as a die-hard Hillary supporter, but I always said that whoever got the Dem nomination (barring Jesse Jackson) would get my vote. I wasn't thrilled with Obama until I watched the convention last week. I was very impressed with him, Michelle and Biden. I think he's very intelligent, has dignity, courage and the qualities a successful leader needs. And I agree with him on the issues. While I have the utmost respect for McCain as a great war hero, I believe as president he'd further ruin our country.
And as to Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama being bitches, that comment really pisses me off. If a woman is intelligent, strong and speaks her mind, she's a bitch. If a man does that he's just a man. I guess we women should just be quiet, submissive doormats. NOT!! Welcome to the 21st century.
And just now, our accountant has to go pay an overdue bill at GA Power for our company and she goes, "I'm going to go stand in line with all the people who have their power shut off because they can't afford their bill but can afford their Barack Obama t-shirt."
The fact that this thread implies only 2 candidates running makes me sick. I vote for neither of them and will probably seek out a third party candidate that represents what this country is supposed to be.
These guys will not be good leaders.
I don't like either.
If Ron Paul still had a chance I'd be voting for him.
Maybe I understand that the process is designed now to keep the influence of a 3rd party candidate to a minimal. Is it right, probably not, but to think Bob Barr, Ron Paul or Nader will be good leaders not only makes me sick but makes laugh.
How are any of the guys you mentioned less qualified than the two major candidates? If anything I rather have someone with less professional political experience run the country. If you go back to when our country began all the politicians were normal people. They were farmers or plantation owners before anything else. They joined politics to help their country, not to make money. We need someone in office that represents the majority of the country, not someone that supports the ideas of a political party. I dont want a career politician. Most of the presidents that I consider to have been great leaders were the John Adams, Thomas Jeffersons, Abe Lincolns all of whom were people first politicians second.
I am not saying I support Ron Paul or any of the candidates you mentioned, but I dont think you should discredit them so quickly when you look at how unqualified the two major candidates really are.