I wonder where this stock response that keeps popping up on the site has come from?
Ah, that's where
If this implication refers to me, I solely admit its true without hesitation or embarrassment. My attempts to give certain members the "basics" are rooted in goodwill, and is expanded when asked.
Sorry guys but why do you chose to overlook what's staring you in the face and choose the easiest option presented to you by a friend.
This isn't what they are doing. Don’t narrow your perception.
Derwyddon is as much of an expert on nutrition as you're likely to find on this site and you argue against her because of an opinion that gets slapped on just about every weight loss thread on this site by people regurgitating something they've been spoon fed but don't understand
A piece of paper doesn't "necessarily" make one wise, lol. Breath in the circumference of the world, and this comes to surface rather quickly.
No one is being spoon fed anything, rather if one were to enlarge the spoon and change the dexterity of approach, some may open their mouth; this is one of the complications with narrowed perception. Perceptions some times stink ones view and narrow the eyes, and thus cant see very well. Don’t let this happen to you, CCR.
I post rather strong to new members, for a variety of reasons. I have a rather intense desire to have them succeed, and know through my own practical experience, earned and learned knowledge how important it is to get the "basics" to one just beginning.
I have a rather intense motivation to aspire----and then deliver a positive approach to the new and existing members while at the same time providing some fundamental basic information, and if necessary, advanced ideas. My own program I have developed for myself has the like intensity I show on the forum.
I rarely say something like this, but its appropriate here: I have been comparably successful in my own right as the other members on this site, and this is utilizing "basics" as well as "advanced" methods of diet and training.
Some newly registered forum members don’t have the "basic's" of nutrition and weight lifting understood; therefore, I post this information for them because I believe its "important" to get them started on their goal journey. In addition, "sometimes" they get short inept responses or none at all.
One needs to understand the "basics" as a foundation to understand more advance methods (For example, using the "three" nutrients and manipulating them for additional fat loss--and using cardio to enhance the effect when fat tissue or body fat percentages drop real low and fat loss is more difficult to achieve; appropriate and calculated fasting methods, using a Ketogenic diet, and advanced progressive weight training techniques)
Therefore, meal "frequency" isn't applicable to-EVERYONE--ALL THE TIME--it depends on the goals and body position of the person. There are diets, dependent upon the goals of the person, that meal frequency is relatively low---to enhance another effect . Yes, advanced dieting does in deed ROCK!
Yes it's true that calorie intake is the most important factor but if you're looking for what's optimal then you need to look at the next level.
I support eating frequent meals for a "nutritional push", and for other reasons. String my posts together in this thread and it becomes quite clear. In addition, string my comments made to new and other members over the past 5 months, and it becomes quite clear, I support frequent meals. I just added in that it DOESN’T increase metabolism.
It is important, however, to have certain members know that if they miss a meal or two because of a busy life style (work, school, religion), that it ISNT going to kill their progress, and they can work around this complication and stay on track with their goal. And, not everyone is striving to be elite athletes, and sometimes the basic essentials are all that one needs. And, sometimes its more than this, dependent upon their goal aspirations. If they change their goal plans, then they have a basic understanding to build upon to move into more advanced methods of diet and training. What I do is correct.
When one eats a before and after workout, what is the purpose? I think "Nutritional Push" fits perfectly.
Why not ask a body builder like Mreik or LV if meal timing isn't important? Or Goergen who's a power lifter?
You left out Stoutman (Steve), and Wrangell, shame on you: I respect their knowledge in addition to the ones you had listed. In addition I would put my progress up against anyone's when they understand what my personal goals were.
Or in the example I gave earlier, a sumo wrestler who eats all his calories in one or two meals so his body stores fat - I don't see their bodies adapting and storing muscle instead of fat
It IS possible, if they ate 7,000 calories, and this was over their caloric need (as an example), and space it out over 30 meals in one day, they would be just as fat, as compared to spacing meals into 2.
In addition, I don't see these type of wrestlers busting there buns in the gym lifting weights; thus no stimulation for muscle growth, LOL. That IS NOT a good example.
Why not ask people who either have qualifications like Derwyddon or have achieved a lot like Mreik rather than take the opinion that's fashionable on the site?
Again, I would put my progress up against anyone's when they understand what my personal goals were.
Your perceptions of what you think you know, on what you read, is off just a tad--on what is underlined.
Oh well, I'm ranting again, but just ask yourself this, are you at your optimal physical state? Have you been achieving great things with your body? If not then maybe you're worshiping false idols. less than 12 months ago I was dead lifting 110lbs, now I'm just about to close in on 400lbs. Just going to the gym day after day wouldn't have made me do that, what made the difference was listening to the qualified people on here. I listened to Derwyddon a lot and although I don't always follow everything she's said at least I know what I should be doing.
There isn't anyone worshiping any false idols, again your perception is off. It's certain persons perverting their perception on what they see.
However, getting different opinions on different subject matter is food for the brain, no one said anything to the contrary. Again, I would stack my achievements against yours or anyone's when the proper perspective of the individual goals are taken into consideration.
Choose where you put your faith very wisely
*Now I'll wait for the inevitable PM's and neg reps that come from disagreeing with Chillen (sorry dude, I love you man but your supporters are fanatical and often crazy, it's like a religious sect)
Let's hope you are not getting any negative rep points, for sharing your perceptive thoughts. Just like you are entitled to share your "appropriate" indirect and direct comments to a person on the forum, they too, are entitled to theirs as long as it fits within the forum rules and regulations, and just as importantly, the integrity of the site.
I haven't changed what I do on this site since I joined in May 07. Its possible some perceptions of what I do have changed over time and/or maintained.
You don’t need to be sorry, I don’t allow others to define who I am. I love you too
. HEHEHE.
I consider everyone on this site a friend of mine, and some elements within friendship are: afflictions and differences are going to come, its how their handled that can make a difference.
Other than that, I dont have any other comment on this section of your post.
Best wishes to you, my friend
Chillen