you did read the article right?
Who do you have more faith in ?
The writings of founding fathers like Wahsington and Jefferson.......or David W. New, Esq. ?
you did read the article right?
Who do you have more faith in ?
The writings of founding fathers like Wahsington and Jefferson.......or David W. New, Esq. ?![]()
Obviously the former LOL
But my original point was that this country was founded and its laws influenced by religon. I was never arguing that the US was a theocracy. How did we get here anyway?
Wow, this thread took off like a rocket. I do have one request, could some of you, I won't name names, stop spewing the bigotry against gays. Just because you're not gay, it doesn't give you the right to spread hate messages about it. It IS natural and it IS beautiful if two people are in love with each other and want to express that love. To call it disgusting, unnatural, deviant or whatever is very wrong. Love is not a detriment to society nor is it harmful to our children. Sexual orientation is not a choice. Just like hair color and skin color are not a choice. Deal with it. There are other people who are different in this world, and just because you can't understand it, it doesn't make it wrong.
Some of you guys are pretty ignorant.
Whether you believe being gay is immoral and unatural is up to you, but no one has a right to tell someone else how they should be living their life and who or who they can not marry.
I guess it boils down to the question of
"do you want your kids exposed to that crap?"
Sexual orientation is a choice
If it is a choice, why would anyone choose to be gay in a society that is generally unfriendly to people who are gay?
As far as the kids go, surely there are plenty of worse things than gay people that they will encounter as they grow up. Addictive recreational drugs (including popular legal ones), sexual recklessness resulting in sexually transmitted disease and/or unwanted pregnancy, bullies / violent criminals, scammers / non-violent criminals, fast food, soda, television advertising, etc.. Better to worry about things that are actually harmful or dangerous to them, as opposed to the mere presence of gay people.
Stop... just stop. Do you realize that the "oppressed" you speak of are significantly better off now than they would have ever been.
... I'm signing off now, shaking my head about your embarassing response.
mind boggling ain't it?
yeah better........I'm sure they enjoyed being enslaved, or hung by rope? ....hmmm....or maybe being put in concentration camps, or imprisoned because of race?
or maybe the poor gay guy in Alabama who died, and his funeral was being protested...wanted the attention?
yeah, sure if they just wouldn't fight for their rights they would all be better off......
This post is awful.
It IS natural and it IS beautiful if two people are in love with each other and want to express that love. To call it disgusting, unnatural, deviant or whatever is very wrong. Love is not a detriment to society nor is it harmful to our children. Sexual orientation is not a choice.
I don't think you're referring to me in this post, because I haven't said anything hateful towards gays... But I do want to point out that it is your opinion that it's "natural and beautiful", and that its a choice... however,
I think it crosses the line when students are no longer allowed to be exposed to the idea of a "mom" and a "dad" at school.
lifting this marriage ban has potential to move us further in the direction that it's "wierd" for someone to have male and female parents that are still married.
While it is true that caucasians don't need to feel an inherent guilt towards other races, it is not true that "other races are better off than they ever would be" That's bull^^^^. Colonization and enslavery are not means to a better end.
I know someone who farms Sheep, he says that if they get in a strop or don't want to do something like change field when it's raining they fall on the floor and pretend to be dead
That's Sheep fact number 1 for the thread
LMAO, is that true?