Lifting Question

If memory serves me I think Steve may disagree. But I swear by a post work out shake. I think I get great recovery benefits from it. 1 scoop of whey and 8oz of 1% milk gives me about 210 calories. I chug one within 30 minutes of a WO. If you need to add a few hundred calories that may be a good way to get them. Add a banana and a tablespoon of peanut butter if you want to kick it up a notch.
 
No, I'm a fan of post workout shakes. I think pre workout nutrition is more important but I too drink a pwo shake. I try to minimize fat intake though (peanut butter) b/c that tends to slow digestion/absorption. This is what you don't want when it's a 'window' of time that the uptake of nutrients is elevated after training.
 
No, I'm a fan of post workout shakes. I think pre workout nutrition is more important but I too drink a pwo shake. I try to minimize fat intake though (peanut butter) b/c that tends to slow digestion/absorption. This is what you don't want when it's a 'window' of time that the uptake of nutrients is elevated after training.

Yeah, I wasnt clear. I just meant add the PB for taste and calories for a shake in general not as a PWO. I sometimes have that for breakfast. PWO I just do the whey and milk.

Sorry for misrepresenting you. I thought I remembered you saying once that PWO meals were unnecessary if your daily nutrition was on point. I may have misremembered or took it out of context.
 
Oh, no need for apologies. And I have said that. I don't think they're necessary at all. I'm just a fan, personally, is all.

Put it this way, of my clients right now, only two of them are drinking PWO shakes.

The majority aren't.
 
When I started losing weight (and joined this forum) I calculated what my daily caloric intake should be. It's about 1700 calories to lose weight. I may need a recalculation since I have lost some weight but I really don't see a need to lower the calories since it is working for me as is. Usually I eat around 1300-1400 calories. I struggle to make that sometimes too.

I can't say what I eat every single day because it it different but it's all pretty low calories. An idea of what I eat on average is grapes, oranges, bananas, avacado, yogurt, turkey, lettuce, wheat bread (at times because I dont like bread much), chicken (I have chicken a lot for dinner), peanut butter, breakfast bars, eggs, milk... things like that. I added the peanut butter recently since it is higher in calories, fat, and protein. I add avacado when I can because of the fat content as well. I try to throw things in to give me added calories but like I said, even then it's hard. I drink primarily water with a glass of juice at least once a day. I am not "strict" on my diet as I still have beer and nachos during football games and such but on average I eat pretty well.

I am wondering if there is something specific high in calories low bad fat that I could eat once a day that would help make up a couple hundred cals.
 
I am jumping in the thread a little late, but I haven't been to the site in a while. To busy at the gym I guess (I wish!).

I have an injury to the area at or slightly above my right SI joint (been to 3 doctors, none have a clue) and have had an operation to my L3-L4 disc. At 380 pounds, I was already "lifting" enough weight just by standing. Working out with free weights just scared me. As the abs and lower back muscles are the bodies biggest stabilizers and thats where my injuries are, I didn't want to risk it. So for me, I am doing, almost exclusively, my entire workout on machines. As all of the machines have seats, I can take a huge load off of the back muscles when I lift. I will start to add free weights in soon I hope. You can do so much more with free weights and hit the muscles at different angles which is something that machines don't let you do.

And now for what the topic has turned toward, shakes (etc.). About 1 hour before a work out, I like to get a somewhat carb rich meal. My favorite is a sort of smoothie. Its been a few years since I have made one, so the amounts may be a little off (I just bought the ingredients today to start making them again myself).
8oz (1 cup)nonfat yogurt (plain or flavored)
1 small or 1/2 large banana
2oz (1/4 cup) concentrated fruit juice (you know, the frozen stuff in the tube you add water to)
(1 scoop vanilla or unflavored protein powder optional, can be soy or whey)

Post work out I like a protein shake mixed with 8oz of Calorie Countdown 2% milk (less sugars), 4oz water and 1 scoop whey protein powder. I am NOT an expert, but I feel like MY muscle growth was helped by the extra shot of protein, in liquid easily digested form, post workout. After all, your muscles need the amino acids from protein to repair or build new muscle. I was able to keep increasing the amount of weights I was able to lift while at the same time losing weight. Your results may vary.

Which order for the exercise? I always start out with a stretching routine followed by 3 sets of 12 reps on the back extension machine and ab machine. That is usually sufficient for me to get my heart rate up. If not, I will do about 5 minutes on the treadmill. Then I do my lifting. Currently, I do only one type of exercise for each muscle because I am just getting back into it, but hope to soon be doing each muscle 2-3 ways. Being a big boy, my lower body gets a pretty good work out just carrying my fat @$$, so I only do lower body twice a week and even then, I am going more toward high reps than high weight (I can already do 3 sets of 12 reps on the calf extension, thigh abductor and adductor machines using ALL the plates, I don't think I need to build more muscle, just use what I have). Upper body I do 3 times per week and am trying to build muscle so when I lose the weight I don't look freakishly disproportionate. After that I do a minimum of 20-30 minutes on the treadmill making sure my heart rate stays around 70%.

I am NOT trying to step on anyone's toes. Steve is a very intelligent person and can teach you a lot. I am just telling you what works for me.
 
I'm not seeing what in your post would be considered "stepping on my toes."

I'm also not understanding how you are applying what a 380 lb man with a bad back does to an average size woman with no contraindications?

Not trying to start anything at all... simply curious, is all.
 
Last edited:
Steve, what would you consider "closer to normal BF%" where a person might start cutting into lean mass with diet?
 
I'm not seeing what your post would be considered "stepping on my toes."

I'm also not understanding how you are applying what a 380 lb man with a bad back does to an average size woman with no contraindications?

Not trying to start anything at all... simply curious, is all.

You have been a member here a lot longer than I have. There are other forums I am a part of that have nothing to do with weight loss or fitness where if you voice a different opinion than that of a "veteran" member, you get stereotyped as a trouble maker and shunned by the majority of members. That is why I don't want anyone to have the impression that I am getting into an "I am right, you are wrong" type of debate. Therefore, I don't want to step on your toes.

This isn't the first time I have attempted to lose weight. About 7 or 8 years ago, I went from 370 down to 225 lbs in a little less than 1 year. That was before I injured my back. The owner of the gym I went to was a former competitive bodybuilder. He also had degrees in nutrition and athletic training. I followed the same routine from the beginning and it worked just as well at 370 as it was at 225. The only reason I stopped losing weight and soon started the slow decent back into obesity is I thought that a change in lifestyle wouldn't affect me (I thought when it came to the weight I had lost, I was bullet proof). I have no doubt that had I actually continued going to the gym and following the changes in diet that I had made, I would have reached my target weight.

So, what I am applying worked on a 370 lb man as well as it did a 225 lb man who didn't have a bad back. It worked for me then, it is beginning to work for me again, and I have seen other people that the gym owner had on the same training and diet that I was on who were having success. They were men and women between I would say 25-45 years of age and all different sizes. No, it didn't work for everyone. That is why I did say that results may vary.

And as a 371 lb person, sure, there are people here who won't really care what I have to say. I am 100% OK with that. I've seen your photo album. Would I try something different in my routine that you suggest? In a heartbeat. I am happy with my routine, but if you, or anyone else on this forum, had success doing something a little different than me, I would at least give it a shot.

Rocky
 
Last edited:
You have been a member here a lot longer than I have. There are other forums I am a part of that have nothing to do with weight loss or fitness where if you voice a different opinion than that of a "veteran" member, you get stereotyped as a trouble maker and shunned by the majority of members. That is why I don't want anyone to have the impression that I am getting into an "I am right, you are wrong" type of debate. Therefore, I don't want to step on your toes.

Well those forums suck.

Steve has cred because he has shown himself to be knowledgeable and sincere. Nothing to do with post count.
One thing I like about this forum is the complete lack of concern for post whoring. If you say something that makes since or you can back up......It will be accepted. If you have 1k posts and say something stupid, you will get called out.

Thats how we roll.
 
Steve, what would you consider "closer to normal BF%" where a person might start cutting into lean mass with diet?

For starters, even when the obese diet, they lose a large portion of lbm. However, they can afford it. Ya see, when someone gains hundreds of pounds, it might look like it's all fat. But it's not. When overfed, we all partition some calories to fat and some to lbm, even in the absence of weight training.

So the real question is at what BF% do we need to start worrying about the lbm that is lost?

It variable for sure. Some people are more genetically inclined to hold on to LBM than others. But when guys start getting down around that 12-15% range and women in the 18-22% range. That's when the body tends to really kick up the survival mechanisms in the body. These are completely ball-parked but you get the idea.

For instance, I have a pretty good feel for my body and when I start using appreciable lbm. It happens to be around 10%, so in relative terms... I'm fortunate.

But what does all this really mean? I think heavy (relative to one's strength) weight training should take place long before the 12-15% range in men and 18-22% range in women. I've never had a woman who needed to lose 200 lbs do serious strength training. But as she progresses to a more normal body weight so does your exercise. It progresses along a continuum from metabolic work (LI cardio, circuit training, etc) to more weight intense stuff (like the typical workouts you see me chat about on here).

I feel like I'm rambling so let me know if you follow that.
 
You have been a member here a lot longer than I have. There are other forums I am a part of that have nothing to do with weight loss or fitness where if you voice a different opinion than that of a "veteran" member, you get stereotyped as a trouble maker and shunned by the majority of members. That is why I don't want anyone to have the impression that I am getting into an "I am right, you are wrong" type of debate. Therefore, I don't want to step on your toes.

Yup, as Ed brought up in his last post... that's not how this forum operates at all. I post on a lot of forums and I know what you're talking about. But we're all about sound information and applicable advice here.

I've got one of the highest post counts here and you damn well better believe that if I say something stupid, I expect to be called on it.

Not that post count has shit all to do with intelligence, which is easily proved on pretty much any forum you chat on.

This isn't the first time I have attempted to lose weight. About 7 or 8 years ago, I went from 370 down to 225 lbs in a little less than 1 year. That was before I injured my back. The owner of the gym I went to was a former competitive bodybuilder. He also had degrees in nutrition and athletic training. I followed the same routine from the beginning and it worked just as well at 370 as it was at 225. The only reason I stopped losing weight and soon started the slow decent back into obesity is I thought that a change in lifestyle wouldn't affect me (I thought when it came to the weight I had lost, I was bullet proof). I have no doubt that had I actually continued going to the gym and following the changes in diet that I had made, I would have reached my target weight.

Yup you would have.

Unfortunately the 'trap' you got caught in is all too common. Diets, in general, don't fail. People fail the diet.

Diet being a weight loss strategy including proper nutrition and exercise in this case.

So, what I am applying worked on a 370 lb man as well as it did a 225 lb man who didn't have a bad back. It worked for me then, it is beginning to work for me again, and I have seen other people that the gym owner had on the same training and diet that I was on who were having success. They were men and women between I would say 25-45 years of age and all different sizes. No, it didn't work for everyone. That is why I did say that results may vary.

I'm sorry.

I'm dense today.

Tell me exactly what is different between what you're suggesting and what's already been discussed.

From what I could tell you are using machines now in hopes of progressing to free weights as your body allows. You're working in the 12 rep range which has already been mentioned.

I'm just not seeing a difference in what's been suggested above. Although I'm tired and stressed so I'm sure I missed something! :) If you could point me to it, it would be appreciated.

Usually if there's a difference it stands out to me. If there doesn't seem to be from my perspective, then it usually turns out to be hair-splitting which in the real world, isn't going to make a lick of difference in terms of results.

And as a 371 lb person, sure, there are people here who won't really care what I have to say. I am 100% OK with that.

Fuck that.

I don't think anyone will write you off around here simply b/c the scale reads a certain number. Information comes from the brain and I'm WELL aware of the fact that just b/c someone has great knowledge in a particular subject, that does not mean he chooses to or knows how to apply it to himself in a meaningful or consistent way.

I've seen your photo album. Would I try something different in my routine that you suggest? In a heartbeat. I am happy with my routine, but if you, or anyone else on this forum, had success doing something a little different than me, I would at least give it a shot.

The thing is The Routine Mentality straight up sucks. Sure, a plan is required for success. A routine though, lacks flexibility and freedom. It's too rigid. And when people get stuck thinking This is the way you should workout, things get ugly.

I haven't followed a routine since I was in highschool.

I make sure I understand the basic, foundational concepts of the human body and how it responds to stress and rest and I mold a lax idea of how I'm going to get from point A to point B.

And how I originally think this will happen usually isn't how I end up doing it when it comes time to apply the idea.

To boot, I've trained a lot of people. And when you apply The Routine idea over a large population of people, the entire concept becomes even more silly.

I've seen bodybuilders (and they are usually the most retarded, not in all cases, but in most I've seen) fight over the stupidest, silliest, tiniest components of a workout. Like, you have to use DBs instead of a BB. Or you have to hit this angle if you want full development. Or you need to use this rep range if you want X.

All those sorts of statements can be translated in my eyes as "I don't know what the fuck I'm talking about. I worship brotology."

I'm not knocking you at all. I'm not suggesting you're of this 'camp.' Shit, I'm not even sure how what you were suggesting differs from what has already been suggested previously. I'm just 'ranting' a bit with regards to the hair-splitting mentality so often seen in these types of circumstances where people yap about the small things while totally missing the big picture.

Welcome aboard Rocky.
 
For starters, even when the obese diet, they lose a large portion of lbm. However, they can afford it. Ya see, when someone gains hundreds of pounds, it might look like it's all fat. But it's not. When overfed, we all partition some calories to fat and some to lbm, even in the absence of weight training.

So the real question is at what BF% do we need to start worrying about the lbm that is lost?

It variable for sure. Some people are more genetically inclined to hold on to LBM than others. But when guys start getting down around that 12-15% range and women in the 18-22% range. That's when the body tends to really kick up the survival mechanisms in the body. These are completely ball-parked but you get the idea.

For instance, I have a pretty good feel for my body and when I start using appreciable lbm. It happens to be around 10%, so in relative terms... I'm fortunate.

But what does all this really mean? I think heavy (relative to one's strength) weight training should take place long before the 12-15% range in men and 18-22% range in women. I've never had a woman who needed to lose 200 lbs do serious strength training. But as she progresses to a more normal body weight so does your exercise. It progresses along a continuum from metabolic work (LI cardio, circuit training, etc) to more weight intense stuff (like the typical workouts you see me chat about on here).

I feel like I'm rambling so let me know if you follow that.
Makes perfect sense, thanks for the response.

I really should start working out, but I completely lack the motivation and financial means to do so. I try to get out and get active as often as possible, walking, kayaking, cycling, etc.... but, I really should get over my paralyzing fear of "the gym" and start moving some weight.
 
I really should start working out, but I completely lack the motivation and financial means to do so. I try to get out and get active as often as possible, walking, kayaking, cycling, etc.... but, I really should get over my paralyzing fear of "the gym" and start moving some weight.

Everyone in the gym is there to do but one thing; Improve something about them selfs. It doesn't matter if your goal is weight loss, muscle building, strength training, or anything else. Every one is there for the exact same reason. To better them self in a way they feel is needed.

Now, you don't have to workout in gym if the cost is a problem. A weight set and squat cage/bench doesn't have to cost that much. Look around garage sales, newspapers, craigslist. There are some fantastic deals to be found.
Hell, even some sandbags, paint cans, 1-5gallon water jugs, and even children can be used as improvisational weights.

You don't need motivation to start. You just need will power. I find that too many people(including myself at times) waste time searching or waiting for motivation to come find them. I say you have to go out and find it yourself.
Just start. Just do it. Simple.
 
I'm sorry.

I'm dense today.

Tell me exactly what is different between what you're suggesting and what's already been discussed.

No, you're not dense today. I don't think there is difference between what you and I have posted. You had asked how can I apply what works for ,a 371 lb man with a bad back, to a woman who is closer to her ideal weight. I just added that what I am doing now with success is the same as what I was doing at 225 lbs and a good back with success. We sort of went around in a big circle before we agreed that we were talking about the same thing, I think.
 
Back
Top