Weight-Loss How many calories should I eat?

Weight-Loss
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's a riddle for those calorie counters out there.

-Person A eats in a 500 calorie defecit every day for a week. At the end of the week, and without water loss, he has lost 1 pound.
-Person B eats in a 500 calorie defecit every day for a week. At the end of the week, and without water loss, he has lost 2 pounds.

Are both of these situations possible?
 
If by deficit you really mean 'estimated deficit', then yes, of course. Especially since humans are lousy estimators.

If deficit means actual calories consumed minus actual calories expended, then no.

I don't know of anyone here who thinks that exercise should be discouraged, but there are plenty of studies that indicate for most people the number of calories they consume has the greatest impact on their weight loss (or lack thereof). Too many people have a tendency to think "Oh, I went to the gym today so I can have some cheesecake with dinner!" with no real idea of how many calories they burned at the gym or how many calories they're eating.
 
The number of calories the body consumes in a day is different for each person. You may notice on the nutritional labeling of foods you buy that the "percentage of daily values" based on a 2000 calorie diet - 2,000 calories is the approximate average of what people eat in a day.
 
Sorry, but those numbers are ridiculous. They don't take into account the current weight, age, or activity level of the person.

And the ranges they specify are too wide to be useful. The difference between 2600 and 3000 calories can be the difference between holding steady and gaining up to a pound a week for some people.

It's like saying all cars should use the same amount of gas - and it should be somewhere between 10 and 20 gallons mpg. It just doesn't work that way.

I agree You cant go of a chart. Every person is different .

And its not about calories its about the food you put into your mouth. that counts . Eating the right stuff at the right time .
 
I have a question. My BMR is around 1400 calories. (I am 5'3" - 125-130 lbs - and 19 years old.)

However, I cannor figure out if I should multiply that by 1.2 or 1.375. What would you do? I don't sit around all day, however, I don't exercise.

I work an average of 8 hours a day, every day. I work at a sub shop so for most (I'd say 7 hours) of the day I am on my feet, but staying in one spot usually... on my laptop. I am active at the beginning of the day prepping, then after that.. I really only move when a customer comes in and if I have to go to the bathroom! After work, I usually just sit and watch TV at home.. Sometimes doing household work.

Would you do 1.2 or 1.375 if you were me? :)

Right now I eat about 1250-1400 calories a day and am maintaining my weight. Which according to my BMR.. I should still be losing. So I'd like to up my calories and still maintain.. But I am starting to think it's not possible. Very confusing.

Thanks.
 
I'd definitely use the higher end of the scale. Standing burns a lot more calories than sitting - and non exercise activity (like standing and moving around) generally burns more calories than working out. Unless you're really really sedentary ;)

So I'd do 1.375 to start!
 
I have to agree with regard to the consensus that one size does not fit all. Even blood type can make a difference in the equation. Great thread.
 
Let's see if I do this right.
66 + (13.7 x 137) + (5 x 197) - (6.8 x 34)
Which would work out to 66+1876.9+985-231,2=3159.1
Now, I'm not very active during most of the day, but I do exercise five times per week, so I'll go with lightly active, which is a 1.375 multiplier to 4343.8.
70% of that would be 3040.6

I think 3040 kcal is a lot even for someone as big and tall as I am. (About six foot six, 302lbs.)
Did I do something wrong?
 
Which would work out to 66+1876.9+985-231,2=3159.1

The last value should be subtracted, not added... don't worry, I did the same thing the first time I checked your numbers :)

So you should get 2696.7, then do your multiplier (1.375) to get roughly 3708.

70% of that should be 2595.6, so approximately 2600 calories per day.
 
How much calorie you eat its depends on your health, body and weight. For getting calorie it is not necessary to consume so much food. You can calculate your calories rate from BMR calculator.
 
Intake of calories

Calorie intake depends on BMR of the body. Every Body has a different BMR index. BMR is calculated on the basis of height and weight of an individual. It is very vital concern that the metabollic rate also makes it essential to calculate the calories needed to be consumed by an individual.
 
I must say, over the years I have come to dismiss all the theoretical formulas for calculating calories and chosen a more straightforward science based way of determining macronutrients.

First, estimate your target lean bodyweight.
(note- this will of course get tweaked as you near it and body composition changes).

Now feed the body you WANT, not the body you have now.
Next -- pretty much stop wasting time on scales and use the MIRROR
Scales do nothing but give you a "dumb" number that says nothing of body composition.

So let us assume, you now weigh 190 but estimate you would be most fit at 150 lbs.

Your daily protein intake should then be 140-150 grams
Your fats will be 25-30% of this (so 40-50 grams max)
These protein and fat levels will be constants
It it the CARBS you will modify to control your weight loss/gain goals.

As a STARTING point if you have no clue where you should be, start with Carbs = Protein X 1.5
In this case Carbs = 225 grams

Needless to say these carbs should be mostly complex, low-glycemic and not simple sugars, starches, etc...
I just worked with a lady that was so perplexed she could not lose weight because she felt she was eating healhy -- BUT ... her daily diet was all yogurt, fruits, smoothies, etc..
She was living on simple sugars .... no wonder !

You then modify those carbs daily till you get going in the direction you want to be
If that means substantial weight loss, then the Net Carbs per meal should be kept under 10 (5 is better).

Add 3 days per week of resisatance training and cardio and that is all you need to reach about any goal you have.

MICHAEL SPITZER - AUTHOR - FITNESS AT 40,50,60 AND BEYOND
 
yes, the right think is Find out what your Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) and in second you must add in the calories you burn through activity
 
Probably the most common questions on the site are about calories: Am I eating enough? Do I really have to eat that many? How many should I eat? What's BMR? What's maintenance? Etc.

So instead of typing the same thing over and over and over again ... here's the sticky version. :)

Ultimately weight loss is about calories in vs. calories out. You must burn more calories than you take in - in other words, create a calorie deficit - in order to lose weight. The easiest way to do that is to cut back on what you eat. However, you don't want to cut back too far - eating too few calories is not good either. Eating too few calories can cause a metabolic slow down that will stall out your weight loss (not permanently, but long enough to cause frustration). It can also make it harder to get in the necessary amounts of nutrition that you need to lose weight healthily. The idea behind cutting calories is to eat as many as you can to keep your metabolism revved while cutting enough to see a reasonable loss each week.

Also, the number of calories you should eat is NOT the same for everyone. If someone tells you that you need to eat X number of calories without knowing your height, weight, and age, then they're just pulling a number out of thin air. And there's no way that someone who is 6' and weighs 250 lbs should be eating the same as someone who is 5'4' and weighs 160 lbs. That's like saying an SUV and a sub-compact should use the same amount of gas. It's just silly.

So how do you determine how many calories to eat?

The standard formula for determining your BMR is based on the Harris-Benedict equation, which is as follows:

For men:
66 + (13.7 x weight in kilos) + (5 x height in cm) - (6.8 x age in years)
For women:
655 + (9.6 X weight in kilos) + (1.8 X height in cm) - (4.7 X age in years).
(see notes below for conversions)

Remember that your BMR is not your maintenance calories. BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate) is the number of calories you'd burn if you did nothing but lie in bed all day and breathe. It's the number of calories you need to run the basic functions of your body; to keep your heart beating, your blood flowing, your lungs working, etc.

Once you've determined your BMR, you'll use an activity multiplier to figure out what your Maintenance calories are; that's the number of calories you need to get through your regular daily activities - things like getting up, showering, going to work, washing dishes, and all those other things that make up your daily life.

The official multipliers for activity are the same for men and women:
1. If you are sedentary (little or no exercise): BMR x 1.2
2. If you are lightly active (light exercise/sports 1-3 days/week): BMR x 1.375
3. If you are moderatetely active (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/week): BMR x 1.55
4. If you are very active (hard exercise/sports 6-7 days a week): BMR x 1.725
5. If you are extra active (very hard exercise/sports & physical job or 2x training): BMR x 1.9

The number that you get from using that multiplier is your MAINTENANCE CALORIES for your current weight.

In order to lose weight, you want to eat less than your maintenance. A good place to start is about 30% less than your maintenance. So subtract 30% from the figure you get and start there.

Keep in mind that calories are always an estimate. No one burns the exact same number of calories every single day. Sleeping in 10 minutes means you'll burn fewer calories. Walking to the bathroom 2x more during the day means you'll burn more calories. If you're hot or cold you'll burn a different amount of calories. If you eat more or less, you'll burn a different amount of calories. So don't obsess down to the exact number. Use the number you get from the calculations as a guideline - if after a few weeks you're not losing weight, drop another 200-300 calories and see what that gets you. Or add in a little more exercise to burn a few more calories.

And remember that as you lose weight, you need fewer calories - so what was your maintenance will begin to be too much. Keep an eye on your weight loss and if it begins to slow down (or if you've lost more than 10% of your bodyweight), try dropping your calories by about 200 (not much more) to keep things going.

That's it. That's all there is to calories - it's not really that hard or that complex. :)

-------------------

To get your weight in kilos, divide your weight in lbs by 2.2 - so someone who weighs 150 lbs will weigh 68.18 kilos

To get your height in centimeters, multiply your height in inches by 2.54 - so someone who is 5'4" (64 inches) will be 162.56 centimeters.

-------------------

Once you know your calorie level, it's a good idea to register for a free account at or to log your meals and make sure you are eating within your calorie range.

This is a very standard and basic way of calculating your calories. It is good as a base to start with, although in my opinion it lacks of factors as what kind of metabolism each person has.
Not everybody is the same and not everybody will respond equally to the same calories.
 
I need some help with this calculation, because I don't think I am doing it right.

66 + (13.7 x weight in kilos) + (5 x height in cm) - (6.8 x age in years)

I am male.
Weight in kilos= I weigh 291. My weight in kilos converted is 995.369 kilos
Height in cm=I am 73 inches tall. Converted into cm that is 185.42

So, my formula would be:

66 + (13.7 X 995.369) + (5 x 185.42) - (6.8 x 34) =
66 + (13636.5553) + (927.1) - (231.2)= 14,398.

Yeah....clearly I'm doing something wrong. Can someone help me with this? I never was great at math!
 
Nevermind...I saw my mistake. Not sure how I got 995.369 kilos! Sheesh, 14,000+ BMR!

66 + (13.7 x 132.27) + (5 x 185.42) - (6.8 x 34)=
66 + (1812.09) + (927.10) - (231.2) = 2573.99

I am moderately active, so 2573.99 x 1.55 = 3989

That seems absurdly too high and impossible to eat!

But I want to lose fat so 3989 x .7 = 2792. That seems more reasonable. Is this post accurate math? Forget about my first one. Not sure what I was thinking with the kilo thing.
 
I did the math on this and if I cut back 30% after adding in my activity level and all....it's under 1k calories. :(

Being petite doesn't leave you much room to tweak your caloric intake.

Looks like it's going to be my workout to get my "burn" over my intake. :boxing:

I would say to not subtract more than 10-20% to prevent extreme hunger.

Ravleen
 
So the calorie calculator thing said I need to consume 2658 calories to lose weight and 1993 to lose it fast.

Today, I probably consumed 1100-1400 calories, so do I need to eat more? I really want to lol it just seems to good to be true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top