ali2
New member
Hi! I am a newbie here and have been doing a lot of reading around on this forum...I have seen a lot of discussions about under-consumption of calories and the effects it can have on your weight loss efforts.
Cliff notes version of my background:
I have lost 60 pounds over the past year through diet and exercise. I work out six days a week evenly split between cardio (mostly elliptical training) and weight training (machines mostly, increasingly more free weight work). I am 31 and currently weigh 204 pounds (come on 199!!!!) I am 5'4" tall (or not depending on how you look at it
)
My goal is to get down to 150 but mostly I want to improve my health and reduce the stress being overweight has wrought on my body.
As far as diet goes, I haven't been adhering to a 'plan' of sorts but have been just eliminating the bulk of junk from my diet and watching my portion sizes. I have loosely attemped to keep my calories in the 1800 range but I don't write down what I am eating, I usually just review it in my head to make sure I haven't gone overboard for the day.
Anyway, I was reading on here about BMR and the Harris Benedict Calculation to determine caloric needs based on activity. My BMR is a tick under 1700 calories per day and when using the Harris Benedict formula I determined that my activity level was very active (based on the workout schedule set forth above, although I suppose I could be deluding myself on that point).
So the Harris Benedict formula sets my caloric needs at 2928 for maintenance, which seems incredibly high. To lose just one pound per week I would need to cut out 500 calories per day to 2428 and to lose two pounds per week I would need to cut to 1928.
I guess what my problem is is that I always thought 1800 was at the high end of caloric needs for weight loss but since my biggest problem is eating, I wanted to make as positive an experience as possible and not deprive myself to the point of failure. I can't imagine that I need to eat so much and can do so and still lose weight.
Am I way off base here? Are my calculations wrong? Is there something I am missing? Like I said, this is an entirely new concept to me and I am working hard to be successful at this. If I should be doing something different, I'll do it. I am always open to learning something new.
Thanks in advance for everyone's advice and suggestions, I can't wait to hear them!!
Cliff notes version of my background:
I have lost 60 pounds over the past year through diet and exercise. I work out six days a week evenly split between cardio (mostly elliptical training) and weight training (machines mostly, increasingly more free weight work). I am 31 and currently weigh 204 pounds (come on 199!!!!) I am 5'4" tall (or not depending on how you look at it
![Smilielol5 :smilielol5: :smilielol5:](/forum/styles/smilies/smilielol5.gif)
My goal is to get down to 150 but mostly I want to improve my health and reduce the stress being overweight has wrought on my body.
As far as diet goes, I haven't been adhering to a 'plan' of sorts but have been just eliminating the bulk of junk from my diet and watching my portion sizes. I have loosely attemped to keep my calories in the 1800 range but I don't write down what I am eating, I usually just review it in my head to make sure I haven't gone overboard for the day.
Anyway, I was reading on here about BMR and the Harris Benedict Calculation to determine caloric needs based on activity. My BMR is a tick under 1700 calories per day and when using the Harris Benedict formula I determined that my activity level was very active (based on the workout schedule set forth above, although I suppose I could be deluding myself on that point).
So the Harris Benedict formula sets my caloric needs at 2928 for maintenance, which seems incredibly high. To lose just one pound per week I would need to cut out 500 calories per day to 2428 and to lose two pounds per week I would need to cut to 1928.
I guess what my problem is is that I always thought 1800 was at the high end of caloric needs for weight loss but since my biggest problem is eating, I wanted to make as positive an experience as possible and not deprive myself to the point of failure. I can't imagine that I need to eat so much and can do so and still lose weight.
Am I way off base here? Are my calculations wrong? Is there something I am missing? Like I said, this is an entirely new concept to me and I am working hard to be successful at this. If I should be doing something different, I'll do it. I am always open to learning something new.
Thanks in advance for everyone's advice and suggestions, I can't wait to hear them!!