Fight For Equality

On the whole I don't normally get too worked up about social and political issues but this have really hit a nerve for me and I feel the need to step up to the plate and fight for freedom shoulder to shoulder with my topless Swedish sisters
 
It's not "discriminating against the female body" or whatever garbage.

I swear, if those type of people had their way, there would be no male or female - just a unisex society with no masculine or feminine traits at all. Any reference to male or female is automatically oppressive - just shut up and be male or female. :rolleyes:
 
I'm not a crazy feminist type, but if you think about it there's nothing dirty or wrong about a woman's breasts. In other cultures women can show their breasts in public. It's just the cultural norm here. We also have all sorts of other weird cultural norms. I have to admit though that, because I have been conditioned in this culture, it would be kind of weird to see a woman walking topless down the street. However living in the part of the country that I do, stuff like that is kind of expected. It would be kind of cool if we could go topless and not freak everyone out. There isn't anything inherently bad or dirty about them, it's just that our culture has made them out to be something dirty, sexual or private. It's just interesting to think about how illogical some of our customs really are.

Oh to Der: Men do have breasts they're just smaller than women's (most of the time).
 
Last edited:
On the whole I don't normally get too worked up about social and political issues but this have really hit a nerve for me and I feel the need to step up to the plate and fight for freedom shoulder to shoulder with my topless Swedish sisters

Whoa - not so fast, my young apprentice...

What kind of breasts are you talking about? If you're talking 70yo 60dd on a 250+ lb woman, yes, damn right they should be covered up. Now, if we're talking 34c on a 24yo 110lb, then yes, I agree, those puppies should be allowed to breathe!
 
Whoa - not so fast, my young apprentice...

What kind of breasts are you talking about? If you're talking 70yo 60dd on a 250+ lb woman, yes, damn right they should be covered up. Now, if we're talking 34c on a 24yo 110lb, then yes, I agree, those puppies should be allowed to breathe!

You do realize that the people who most want to bare all are typically those that should cover up.
 
I've always wondered: Is it comfortable for any women to have no support up there? I mean, I think I'm on the small size but I couldn't imagine doing many activities without a bra...
 
You do realize that the people who most want to bare all are typically those that should cover up.

I don't know. With the recent trend of overt and demeaning sexuality in young women, you may be seeing more of it. More young women are becoming more and more willing to show their breasts to eager men (and women) because they think it frees them sexually (they also do it to get attention) . (I'm talking about GGW kind of stuff) It's a load of garbage if you ask me. Flashing people and acting "sexy", or at least how we commercially define "sexy", in no way frees women. It demeans them even further.

All I'm saying is that there are plenty of places to see young women who want to bear their breasts.
 
I've always wondered: Is it comfortable for any women to have no support up there? I mean, I think I'm on the small size but I couldn't imagine doing many activities without a bra...

God! It would be pure heaven if we didn't have to wear bras. They're the most uncomfortable thing ever devised. I'm not flat chested either. I'm a 32 B.

Sometimes I feel like they were invented as devices of torture by sadists who like to see people like me miserable.
 
God! It would be pure heaven if we didn't have to wear bras. They're the most uncomfortable thing ever devised. I'm not flat chested either. I'm a 32 B.

Sometimes I feel like they were invented as devices of torture by sadists who like to see people like me miserable.

Are you freaking kidding me? Can you run without a bra?
 
nothing dirty about breasts, sure. Nothing dirty about a ***** or vagina either, aslong as you wash.

The dirty thing doesn't hold, because I'm willing to bet the mouth is more dirty than those 3 places, combined ;) And we don't need to cover that up, do we?
 
oh like that. Get your point. well yeah. Butts aren't naighty either imo (unless you're spreading out, showing your anus). I guess it's just that we cover all our "sexual" bodyparts.

Anyways, I'm a firm believer that it's society that decides what bodyparts are "sexual" I mean, if everyone were to wear a band over their knees, and only take it off when having sex, and everyone did that for 10000 years. It would be like "ooh.. look at those knees!" instead of boobs :D
 
Anyways, I'm a firm believer that it's society that decides what bodyparts are "sexual" I mean, if everyone were to wear a band over their knees, and only take it off when having sex, and everyone did that for 10000 years. It would be like "ooh.. look at those knees!" instead of boobs :D

It doesn't even take 1000 years. In places in the world where women are very covered up (think some Middle Eastern countries, like Saudi Arabia), parts of the body like elbows and knees are deemed erotic.

It's about culture and sensitivities.
 
two bare-breasted young women

That's totally fine.

Actually I would prefer to have something left to the imagination, but on the topic of having guys walk around with their wangs out, I would love walking around nude...although I would want to cover up when I sit down somewhere. That's just not sanitary.

Topless is vastly different from bottomless, regardless of sex. When bottomless...not only is it not sanitary, it's dangerous. Stuff can snag for the males. And for the females...ever have a peice of dirt fly into your mouth on a windy day? Not a good idea to have two open lips.
 
Yes I prefer to work out without one. They're too restricting.

Comfort aside, that can be bad for the breast tissue later on. Think of it like tanning beds, sure they may not bother you now, but you'll look all wrinkly later from them. Well, they may still be perky now, but run around w/out a good bra and they'll look about as good as overtanned skin in 20 yrs.

----------
I agree that there is nothing inherently "naughty" about breasts, anatomically speaking. They are meant to serve a utilitarian purpose of feeding babies.


There are beliefs that the attraction is connected w/ the more "primal instinct" that curvy hips and large breasts represent increased ability to bear and feed children (yes, we know differently now, but not thousands of years ago). Same as large, muscular men were attractive for their ability to protect the family and club bears and stuff.

Either way, the fact remains that breasts are associated w/ sex, and illicit a sexual response in heterosexual men (and lesbians). Even men who are more into thongs, or are into feet, you name it - there is still a sexual connection.

So, when the day comes that boobs no longer result in woodies, then I say sure - run around free as a bird.

-------------

I agree that most things that supposedly empower women do anything but that.

In all seriousness, so many women dress, walk, talk, and act like whores, calling it empowerment, then freak out when they aren't treated w/ respect. Well, act like a lady, and you'll be treated like one. Pretty simple.
 
Comfort aside, that can be bad for the breast tissue later on. Think of it like tanning beds, sure they may not bother you now, but you'll look all wrinkly later from them. Well, they may still be perky now, but run around w/out a good bra and they'll look about as good as overtanned skin in 20 yrs.

Actually, going bra-less actually helps keep them perky. It's a myth that it makes them sag.



Take a look at the french study. The results will surprise you.

Here's the conclusion of the study in case you don't feel like clicking the link:

"The rules of the society may force you to wear a bra to work or to social occasions, but there's no need to wear one for the purpose of preventing the eventual sagging. Remember also that breasts will benefit from bra-free time, so it is good to take the bra off whenever you can."
 
Last edited:
Actually, going bra-less actually helps keep them perky. It's a myth that it makes them sag.



Take a look at the french study. The results will surprise you.

Here's the conclusion of the study in case you don't feel like clicking the link:

"The rules of the society may force you to wear a bra to work or to social occasions, but there's no need to wear one for the purpose of preventing the eventual sagging. Remember also that breasts will benefit from bra-free time, so it is good to take the bra off whenever you can."

Oh, so is that why the tribal women on National Geographic have such beautiful, perky breasts? from going braless? :p

Besides, what do the French know anyhow, buncha "cheese eating surrender monkeys".............

Ok, don't jump me - I don't really care about the French one way or the other, I just wanted a reason to quote Groundskeeper Willie from the Simpsons b/c I find that a really funny satirical quote.
 
Back
Top