You ask why is it bad and I ask how can it be good? Same difference. Neither side can provide drastic evidence for their arguments but common sense (remember common sense? it died off long ago and is slowly making a comeback) says that the extra chemicals, additives, hormones in our foods today are bad.
That's all I'm saying.
It's not the same at all, I haven't made a claim that it's safe or unsafe, I've just questioned the assumed truth that something unnatural is inherently unsafe.
Common sense? That tells you that buying beef patties at amazingly low prices which have cooked by a teenager with an hours training is a bad idea.
It doesn't tell you that unnatural=unhealthy though; that's called ignorance
EDIT: I really don't want to come across as though I'm defending McDonalds and whatever they've done to their food to make it resist degrading in a normal way. I'm just saying that criticizing something without knowing what's actually wrong with it is accepting ignorance as a valid point of view. Whatever happened to science?
Last edited: