ManLondon, you're pretty much as ignorant as the next guy on Buddhism if you can't even aknowledge what I've said. I don't give a **** how many books you've read, or how long Buddhism has been around.
1.) You're not someone who has "been reading, following, practising, meditating and teaching something for hundreds of years".
2.) You are avoiding facing the real argument
3.) Your claims are fallicious
And I conclude you're too arrogant and you have too much ego to face me and lose some face yourself. At this same time, it shows how hypocritical it is to call yourself Buddhist. That, or you have a LONG ways to go (on the Eight Fold Path...I'm sure you've come across this in your books). If indeed you've been "reading, following, practising, meditating and teaching something for hundreds of years," I'd say you've got maybe 5 or 6 more millenia to go.
Of course, look at me. How what a bad Buddhist I am to be calling you on your bull****.
But I will show some modesty:
I don't think I am a super-genius at all. Nah, I'm just smarter than you are, and that's not much of a feat.
1.) You're not someone who has "been reading, following, practising, meditating and teaching something for hundreds of years".
2.) You are avoiding facing the real argument
3.) Your claims are fallicious
And I conclude you're too arrogant and you have too much ego to face me and lose some face yourself. At this same time, it shows how hypocritical it is to call yourself Buddhist. That, or you have a LONG ways to go (on the Eight Fold Path...I'm sure you've come across this in your books). If indeed you've been "reading, following, practising, meditating and teaching something for hundreds of years," I'd say you've got maybe 5 or 6 more millenia to go.
Of course, look at me. How what a bad Buddhist I am to be calling you on your bull****.
But I will show some modesty:
I don't think I am a super-genius at all. Nah, I'm just smarter than you are, and that's not much of a feat.
As in a whole bunch of different people.