Actually, other than piece of mind, Nothing. The actual nutritional value of a food is not higher or lower because it was grown organically. I am just speaking about fruits and veggies.
The biggest study ever of organic food was completed in 2007[48] and found that organic fruit and vegetables contain up to 40% more antioxidants than conventional equivalents, and that the figure was 60% for organic milk. The 4-year study was funded by the European Union and was the largest of its kind ever undertaken.[49]
A 2001 study by researchers at Washington State University concluded, under judgement by a panel of tasters, that organic apples were sweeter. Along with taste and sweetness, the texture as well as firmness of the apples were also rated higher than those grown conventionally. These differences are attributed to the greater soil quality resulting from organic farming techniques compared to those of conventional farming.[50]
Some studies have shown higher nutrient levels in organic fruit and vegetables compared with conventionally grown products. However, due to the difficulty with designing such experiments, the evidence was not considered conclusive([51]) until the release of the University of Sheffield study in 2007 (see above).
A 2002 meta-analysis (a review of all past studies on the subject) found no proof that organic food offers greater nutritional values, more consumer safety or any distinguishable difference in taste.[52][53][54][55]
A new report published in March 2008 by The Organic Center, which promotes organic food, claims that organic food is on average 25% more nutritious than conventional food.[56]
Some think it is better for the environment- Look up the actual effects of growing organically, it may surprise you.
A study published in 2002 showed that "Organically grown foods consistently had about one-third as many residues as conventionally grown foods."[29][30]
Several surveys and studies have attempted to examine and compare conventional and organic systems of farming. The general consensus across these surveys[4][5] is that, in the short term, organic farming is less damaging for the following reasons:
* Organic farms do not consume or release synthetic pesticides into the environment — some of which have the potential to harm soil, water and local terrestrial and aquatic wildlife.
* Organic farms are better than conventional farms at sustaining diverse ecosystems, i.e., populations of plants and insects, as well as animals.
* When calculated either per unit area or per unit of yield, organic farms use less energy and produce less waste, e.g., waste such as packaging materials for chemicals.
However, many critics of organic farming methods believe that the increased land needed to farm organic food could potentially destroy the rainforests and wipe out many ecosystems.[6] [7]
We could go back and forth playing "study" ping-pong.
I can cite many sources about the myths of what Orgainc farming is today. Don't fool yourself, it is just big business.
If you want quality, do not look for the Organic label, look for items that are locally grown. I belong to a farmer's co-op and all of my fruit and veggies come from it. Some are organic some are not but they are local and I'm proud that my dollars are going into helping the small farmer.
Originally Posted by camphoroilexpor
Organic crops must be grown in safe soil. organic foods have more beneficial nutrients, such as antioxidants, than their conventionally grown counterparts.Organic food is batter for your health.
Thanks
Kewra oil