RicerDalemon
New member
Background: I have been running for ca. 2 years, about 3200 lifetime miles. I am 5'8" and weigh between 147 and 150 (so, BMI 23 or just under). My volume for the last year has been in the 40-45 mpw range. Since November I've been training for my first marathon, in May. In the course of this training I've recently bumped my mileage up to the low 50s, as much as I've ever run before (I'm aiming to peak in a few months at 65-70 miles). I'm shooting for a time around 3:30. So far training has gone so well I've allowed myself to hope I might even pull off a faster time.
So my question: I think I'm a bit of a heavy runner and that I could be faster if I dropped twenty pounds. I also appreciate that I'm just starting out and that many heavier runners are a lot faster than me. In other words, I recognize that my weight is not necessarily the only or even the most important factor limiting my performance.
Still, if losing weight is a path to being a better and a faster runner I'd like to do that. So my questions:
Surely I risk sacrificing some adaptations/supercompensations if I start restricting calories during my training program. Is there any way to predict what sacrifices those might be precisely? Am I going to lose aerobic fitness, is my lactate threshold going to come down, am I going to lose muscle strength, is it going to take me longer to recover between long runs/speed sessions?
Given these potential disadvantages and my current BMI, could the potential gains from getting lighter compensate or even put me ahead?
I had the crazy idea I might alternate weeks of caloric restriction (to lose weight) with weeks of maintenance (to allow for training adaptations). Does that even make sense or would I be better off restricting my calories at half the margin overall?
I have some experience with dieting while running at medium volume and it wasn't a great feeling. On the other hand, I'm never not running these days, so if I need to get thinner to be a better runner, there will have to be some pain.
Thanks for any help, and again apologies if this doesn't belong here.
So my question: I think I'm a bit of a heavy runner and that I could be faster if I dropped twenty pounds. I also appreciate that I'm just starting out and that many heavier runners are a lot faster than me. In other words, I recognize that my weight is not necessarily the only or even the most important factor limiting my performance.
Still, if losing weight is a path to being a better and a faster runner I'd like to do that. So my questions:
Surely I risk sacrificing some adaptations/supercompensations if I start restricting calories during my training program. Is there any way to predict what sacrifices those might be precisely? Am I going to lose aerobic fitness, is my lactate threshold going to come down, am I going to lose muscle strength, is it going to take me longer to recover between long runs/speed sessions?
Given these potential disadvantages and my current BMI, could the potential gains from getting lighter compensate or even put me ahead?
I had the crazy idea I might alternate weeks of caloric restriction (to lose weight) with weeks of maintenance (to allow for training adaptations). Does that even make sense or would I be better off restricting my calories at half the margin overall?
I have some experience with dieting while running at medium volume and it wasn't a great feeling. On the other hand, I'm never not running these days, so if I need to get thinner to be a better runner, there will have to be some pain.
Thanks for any help, and again apologies if this doesn't belong here.