Viagra

M

Msmballas2k4

0
Hey, i dont know if this is the right place to post this but sorry if its in the wrong place. But i was wondering if anyone has tried or has extensive information on the use of viagra for someone who does not have ED. I was just curious as to the exact effect people have experianced with using viagra without ED or the effects people are supposed to recieve. Thanks for any of the information you guys provide me.
 
Instant loss of manhood; pecker'll fall right off. But, seriously I suppose it would just, um, well do its job.
 
I've taken it.......The stuff almost made my heart beat out of my chest though, amongst other things.
 
JaymieB said:
why would you take it if you didn't have ED anyway...
Click to expand...

I dont know how appropriate this is, but as you hit your 30's things still work, but they don't work as well as they did when you were 16, put simply
 
i thought that if it was taken when you didn't have ED it could actually cause issues.

if it ain't broken, leave it alone...lol!! ;)
 
I've taken it and don't have ED. Rock solid for at least 2 rounds, sometimes 3.

Oh I had no heart beat problems either, as were described above.
 
Last edited:
lmao Karky

Maybe I should try it, I've never had a 4-hour-erection. 'If your erection lasts more than 4 hours, please seek immediate medical attention'. Imagine going to the hospital and asking for help with that. lol.
 
junkfoodbad said:
See this is what i mean. The difference between 16 and 30.
Click to expand...

Sure, there is partial sense in what you say, but, I would say the statement is too generic and simplistic view.

As compared to a 16 yo boy, men in late 20s look better, have more experience, bit more intelligent, understand themselves and women better, finished more books on KamaSutra and generally are able to satisfy a woman better.

If you would like an example, just ask me.

At the age of 29, after action, I see that look on women's face, that make me realise why women keep coming back. It is such an ego booster.
 
Last edited:
Karky said:
im 17..
teach me! :p
Click to expand...

Hey Karky I did not mean to give an impression that I could be a teacher.
I just wanted to say that I feel my best at 29 and that I am example of someone who feels better about oneself at 29 than at 16. I am sure there many men out there who feel the same.

And you do not need any coaching. I am sure you are doing great!:)
 
ManLondon said:
Sure, there is partial sense in what you say, but, I would say the statement is too generic and simplistic view.

As compared to a 16 yo boy, men in late 20s look better, have more experience, bit more intelligent, understand themselves and women better, finished more books on KamaSutra and generally are able to satisfy a woman better.

If you would like an example, just ask me.

At the age of 29, after action, I see that look on women's face, that make me realise why women keep coming back. It is such an ego booster.
Click to expand...

i agree completely. i was refering more to the physical hardness and the ability to recouperate quickly
 
junkfoodbad said:
i agree completely. i was refering more to the physical hardness and the ability to recouperate quickly
Click to expand...

True, the harmones and etc. work at peak in teens and early twenties.
The hardness and the ability to recuperate will, generally, get worse with age, but, really, late twenties or early thirties is still too early to worry about it.
 
lol what does it do for women?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top