Starvation mode...exaggeration?

Ando3242

New member
I hear a lot about how low calorie diets supposedly put your body into "starvation mode" where the body thinks its starving thus it holds on to fat instead of burning it. But, is this really true? I'm a skeptic. It seems to me perhaps it is... but only in long periods of intense starvation. Perhaps a famine, but not someone who eats a few healthy low calorie meals a day.

I'm no expert though, that's why I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.
 
I hear a lot about how low calorie diets supposedly put your body into "starvation mode" where the body thinks its starving thus it holds on to fat instead of burning it. But, is this really true? I'm a skeptic. It seems to me perhaps it is... but only in long periods of intense starvation. Perhaps a famine, but not someone who eats a few healthy low calorie meals a day.

I'm no expert though, that's why I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.

When your body is in starvation mode your metabolism slows down, it can slow down by as much as 40% according to this study:



Various changes reflected an overall slowing of the body's physiological processes. There were decreases in body temperature, heart rate, and respiration, as well as in basal metabolic rate (BMR). BMR is the amount of energy (in calories) that the body requires at rest (i.e., no physical activity) in order to carry out normal physiological processes. It accounts for about two-thirds of the body's total energy needs, with the remainder being used during physical activity. At the end of semistarvation, the men's BMRs had dropped by about 40% from normal levels. This drop, as well as other physical changes, reflects the body's extraordinary ability to adapt to low caloric intake by reducing its need for energy. More recent recent research has shown that metabolic rate is markedly reduced even among dieters who do not have a history of dramatic weight loss (Platte, Wurmser, Wade, Mecheril & Pirke, 1996). During refeeding, Keys et al. found that metabolism speeded up, with those consuming the greatest number of calories experiencing the largest rise in BMR. The group of volunteers who received a relatively small increment in calories during refeeding (400 calories more than during semistarvation) had no rise in BMR for the first 3 weeks. Consuming larger amounts of food caused a sharp increase in the energy burned through metabolic processes.


You will obviously still lose weight, it's just impossible to gain weight unless you're overeating. But you might not do it optimally or as quickly as you can. For example, if normally you need 2000 calories but eat 1500 without going into starvation you will lose a pound a week. But if you start eating 1000 calories and go into starvation mode so your body operates on 1200 calories a day you will only lose half a pound a week (and you'll feel weaker, hungrier, and experience all the other bad side effects of starvation).

From what I read, you're never going to gain weight by eating too little, it's simple physics as your body still needs to maintain temperature and replace cells. The problem is that when you're extreme with not eating you are going to lose lean mass as well, your organs, your muscles. Since muscles use more calories than fat, one way for the body to get by on fewer calories is to lose some of the muscle. This is not what anyone who wants to lose weight wants for obvious reasons.

It just comes down to the fact that our bodies evolved to survive famines and other food shortages.
 
Last edited:
I don't know about older people, but I'm guessing it's the same for everyone. Your body's metabolism really does get permanently (or at least long term) messed up if you don't eat a healthy, balanced (including calories) diet. I know this from personal experience and I'm still dealing with the results of my starvation diet a few years ago. Seriously, it does make weight loss a lot harder.
 
Apparently the last organ the body will shut down is the brain so when humans have insufficient calories (for whatever reason) the body will leech the nutrients it needs to survive from the rest of the body - bones, muscle tissue, fat.

When the body starts eating itself this way people will lose muscle and bone density. The heart is a muscle so heart failure is a risk.

Depending on the sex and age of the individual the damage can be largely reversible but, if the diet is not corrected, then a shortened life is likely.

It just isn't a good idea to mess with our bodies that way. I know it is fashionable to be thin these days and many people target to be 1 - 2 dress sizes below a healthy weight for them. But it is dangerous to our long term health.

I hate looking at the skinny catwalk models because I know they are not healthy but the image they present is putting enormous pressure on women. It is a disgrace and I wish they would stop it. Most of us live in countries with plenty of food and it's awful to think we can't just enjoy the good life we lead due to an ignorant media.
 
Your body's metabolism really does get permanently (or at least long term) messed up if you don't eat a healthy, balanced (including calories) diet.

No, thats not true that you can ever permanently mess up your metabolism. I know our mod Steve has written some good stuff on metabolism and starvation mode....http://weight-loss.fitness.com/topic/9468-starvation-calories-adaptations.html

SPINNER...I think you greatly misunderstood. The OP was referring to "starvation mode" a period referred to when you don't lose weight for a certain period of time due to maybe having too few calories in your diet...he was not referring to ACTUALLY starving yourself.
 
Last edited:
I've seen it happen... I'm just speaking from experience, not a bunch of science. There's a lot of stuff that nutritionists/dietitians either don't know or keep a secret.

The way you semi-permanently mess up your metabolism is by losing muscle during starvation. Muscle burns a lot more calories at rest than fat, so if you lose muscle and fail to gain it back your metabolism will be lowered until you regain that muscle.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top