The theory behind Negative Calorie Diet is interesting. It works on the idea that your body has to burn energy to digest food whereas in actual reality, it is burning fat.
Take an orange for instance, which may contain 60 calories. It would take certain amount of energy in order to process all the nutrients and vitamins within the orange. In so doing, you would be burning more than 60 calories. The Negative Calorie Diet claims that after consuming certain negative calorie foods like orange, your body is left with net calories fallout which is a negative calorie deduction. Therefore, for every orange you eat, you should be burning off 25 calories. That is one of the reasons which advocate that in Negative Calorie Diet, it is necessary to eat frequent meals.
Those who criticize the Negative Calorie Diet argue that no food possesses negative calories and you cannot eat your way to weight loss. They also say that that by following the Negative Calorie Diet, you are potentially offsetting your positive calorie energy reserves, thus canceling out the effectiveness of weight training. This criticism argues that we need calories to create energy both for exercise as well as to recover from these exercises.
Those favoring this diet concede that while it is true that there is no such food which may contain negative calories, but they also insist that by taking certain foods, you are actually increasing the metabolic process which can result in weight loss.
Arguments in favor of Negative Calorie Diet:
* Little effort involved.
* Promotes consumption of foods rich in vitamins and minerals.
* Increases the body?s metabolism.
Arguments against Negative Calorie Diet:
* No scientific proof to confirm its effectiveness.
* Very little info surrounding diet.
* More theoretical than practical.
The Negative Calorie Diet works on the concept that certain (negative calorie foods) contain a surplus of vitamins and minerals which can speed up enzyme production in quantities sufficient to break down not only its own calories, but also additional calories that are present in the digestive system.
Take an orange for instance, which may contain 60 calories. It would take certain amount of energy in order to process all the nutrients and vitamins within the orange. In so doing, you would be burning more than 60 calories. The Negative Calorie Diet claims that after consuming certain negative calorie foods like orange, your body is left with net calories fallout which is a negative calorie deduction. Therefore, for every orange you eat, you should be burning off 25 calories. That is one of the reasons which advocate that in Negative Calorie Diet, it is necessary to eat frequent meals.
Those who criticize the Negative Calorie Diet argue that no food possesses negative calories and you cannot eat your way to weight loss. They also say that that by following the Negative Calorie Diet, you are potentially offsetting your positive calorie energy reserves, thus canceling out the effectiveness of weight training. This criticism argues that we need calories to create energy both for exercise as well as to recover from these exercises.
Those favoring this diet concede that while it is true that there is no such food which may contain negative calories, but they also insist that by taking certain foods, you are actually increasing the metabolic process which can result in weight loss.
Arguments in favor of Negative Calorie Diet:
* Little effort involved.
* Promotes consumption of foods rich in vitamins and minerals.
* Increases the body?s metabolism.
Arguments against Negative Calorie Diet:
* No scientific proof to confirm its effectiveness.
* Very little info surrounding diet.
* More theoretical than practical.
The Negative Calorie Diet works on the concept that certain (negative calorie foods) contain a surplus of vitamins and minerals which can speed up enzyme production in quantities sufficient to break down not only its own calories, but also additional calories that are present in the digestive system.
