As it stands for me, I'm a very on-again-off-again gym person. Most of the reason is entirely because of life demands on me, as they increase from time to time, or slack up entirely.
I've noticed something about myself though:
For the first 3 weeks of working out, my strength is less than when I stopped previously, and then the next day my muscles will be sore. I think this type of soreness has been described as a lactic acid build up.
However, after 3 weeks, my strength usually has returned to what it previously was, and I possibly even made a new gain. I also don't feel that same pain the next day, my muscles will feel more fatigued instead, and I can't lift quite as much until it repairs itself.
Now because I'm able to feel what i'm calling the "lactic acid pain" in the first 3 weeks, is it safe to assume that after this 3 week period, that it takes the same time for my muscles to heal, as it does during my initial 3 week period? Or have my muscles adapted to the new stimulus, and are able to repair faster? (assuming equal diet)
The reason I'm curious, is because during this "lactic acid pain" period, it takes about 4 days before I'm able to strength train my muscles again, however, after this period has passed, I could possibly even work out again the next day. With this in mind, wouldn't it be more efficient to allow my muscles to heal again before resuming strength training? In effect, should I separate my workouts in a larger span while still achieving an almost identical gain?
Thoughts on the subject would be appreciated
I've noticed something about myself though:
For the first 3 weeks of working out, my strength is less than when I stopped previously, and then the next day my muscles will be sore. I think this type of soreness has been described as a lactic acid build up.
However, after 3 weeks, my strength usually has returned to what it previously was, and I possibly even made a new gain. I also don't feel that same pain the next day, my muscles will feel more fatigued instead, and I can't lift quite as much until it repairs itself.
Now because I'm able to feel what i'm calling the "lactic acid pain" in the first 3 weeks, is it safe to assume that after this 3 week period, that it takes the same time for my muscles to heal, as it does during my initial 3 week period? Or have my muscles adapted to the new stimulus, and are able to repair faster? (assuming equal diet)
The reason I'm curious, is because during this "lactic acid pain" period, it takes about 4 days before I'm able to strength train my muscles again, however, after this period has passed, I could possibly even work out again the next day. With this in mind, wouldn't it be more efficient to allow my muscles to heal again before resuming strength training? In effect, should I separate my workouts in a larger span while still achieving an almost identical gain?
Thoughts on the subject would be appreciated