Age 23
Ht. 5'9
Wt. 160lbs
Bf. 16% (got it off a digital Tanita scale, dunno how accurate)
BMR 1782 (again, I don't know how accurate this is. I've recently changed my diet significantly ie- removed 70 cans of beer a week from it)
I just started lifting 5 days a week and I do cardio (jog) 2-3 days a week for 10-20 minutes (1 mile or 2) at a time, staying in my target HR for the majority of those minutes.
Here is the BULK diet that I've come up with -
Here is the CUT diet that I've come up with -
Which of these routes would you recommend I take first? I know that if I cut now, I'll have very little muscle to show for it once I've lost my fat. Would it be harder to build muscle with my BULK diet after doing a cut? I've tried to make each diet as clean as possible.
I read threads similar to the one I'm making now, where skinnyfat people asked whether or not they should bulk first or cut, and I saw alot of people recommending a slow bulk to start. I'm afraid that if I did that I'd gain alot of fat. The reason I think this is because I'm a complete novice to weight lifting, and I'm probably not going to build muscle very fast while I'm trying to learn proper form and progress in my training to lifting heavier amounts. I fear that all of those calories in my bulk diet would turn to fat. If is indeed a good possibility, I'd rather be losing weight now with a cutting diet and worry about bulking later with a clean bulk diet.
This stuff is all new to me, but I have tried to do my share of research so that I at least understand the basis of what I'm trying to do here. It's just that I don't have any first hand experience with how the body reacts to diets and stuff like that.
Any help or suggestions you guys could give would be highly appreciated.
Ht. 5'9
Wt. 160lbs
Bf. 16% (got it off a digital Tanita scale, dunno how accurate)
BMR 1782 (again, I don't know how accurate this is. I've recently changed my diet significantly ie- removed 70 cans of beer a week from it)
I just started lifting 5 days a week and I do cardio (jog) 2-3 days a week for 10-20 minutes (1 mile or 2) at a time, staying in my target HR for the majority of those minutes.
Here is the BULK diet that I've come up with -
Here is the CUT diet that I've come up with -
Which of these routes would you recommend I take first? I know that if I cut now, I'll have very little muscle to show for it once I've lost my fat. Would it be harder to build muscle with my BULK diet after doing a cut? I've tried to make each diet as clean as possible.
I read threads similar to the one I'm making now, where skinnyfat people asked whether or not they should bulk first or cut, and I saw alot of people recommending a slow bulk to start. I'm afraid that if I did that I'd gain alot of fat. The reason I think this is because I'm a complete novice to weight lifting, and I'm probably not going to build muscle very fast while I'm trying to learn proper form and progress in my training to lifting heavier amounts. I fear that all of those calories in my bulk diet would turn to fat. If is indeed a good possibility, I'd rather be losing weight now with a cutting diet and worry about bulking later with a clean bulk diet.
This stuff is all new to me, but I have tried to do my share of research so that I at least understand the basis of what I'm trying to do here. It's just that I don't have any first hand experience with how the body reacts to diets and stuff like that.
Any help or suggestions you guys could give would be highly appreciated.