"The number of adverse event reports described by the FDA in its advisory is small relative to the many millions of people who have used Hydroxycut products over the past seven years," said the company statement. "Iovate's own assessment of the potential risk associated with the use of these products differs from that expressed by the FDA."
the company said it agreed to the recall out of "an abundance of caution."
Katz said it has taken so long to get a handle on the Hydroxycut problem because the cases of liver damage were rare and the FDA has no authority to review supplements before they're marketed. "
The FDA relies on voluntary reports to detect such problems, and many cases are never reported, officials acknowledge.
Public health researcher Ano Lobb, who has studied Hydroxycut and other dietary supplements for Consumer Reports, said the problem may be an ingredient called hydroxycitric acid. Derived from a tropical fruit, it's been linked to liver problems in at least one medical journal study.
I'm always skeptical of these findings. It's obvious that not everyone who take hydroxycut gets liver damage, but what separated these people from the ones who did? Could it be that they were used excessively more? Or less? Or what? No one person is ever clear. I neither find it safe or unsafe because it's not conclusive either way.
In the article, it says the following:
The amount they sold don't exactly match the amount of people who died. The report only indicates at least one or two people who died using this product.
Were they recalled truly because it was a voluntary action? Or was it recalled because the FDA has a hold on it?
The so-called "caution" would mean to me at the very least they acknowledge something is wrong with their products because no one would just pull something unless they have reasons to believe something is wrong, right?
Just how rare was the liver damage?
The main reason why I disagree with FDA and the manufacture of Hydroxycut. Everyone relies on voluntary reports, and how can you tell if they're true? They need hard data to say something is wrong.
Now this is getting somewhere! However, again it's not conclusive. It's only "linked" to liver problems, but it doesn't mean you're going to get liver problems.
They need hard data to say if something is safe or not.
For example, Alli (spelling?) is approved by the FDA. Did anyone compare the ingredients of Alli with those in Hydroxcut?
oinly one thing here matters to ME!
that Calcium realizes she is way higher quality than some pill poppin wench!
SO- they can all lose a liver, and die, or all get super shapely,..,.,. but for you, lil lovely, just stay clean!
FF