Weight-Loss How the Ideology of Low Fat Conquered America

Weight-Loss

Toddless

New member
I hope the link is ok to post, it's from the Journal of the History of Medicine website. This is an amazing and fascinating (and UNBIASED!) look into the history of American diets. I would encourage everyone to take some time and read this. Here's the first part:

This article examines how faith in science led physicians and patients to embrace the low-fat diet for heart disease prevention and weight loss. Scientific studies dating from the late 1940s showed a correlation between high-fat diets and high-cholesterol levels, suggesting that a low-fat diet might prevent heart disease in high-risk patients. By the 1960s, the low-fat diet began to be touted not just for high-risk heart patients, but as good for the whole nation. After 1980, the low-fat approach became an overarching ideology, promoted by physicians, the federal government, the food industry, and the popular health media. Many Americans subscribed to the ideology of low fat, even though there was no clear evidence that it prevented heart disease or promoted weight loss. Ironically, in the same decades that the low-fat approach assumed ideological status, Americans in the aggregate were getting fatter, leading to what many called an obesity epidemic. Nevertheless, the low-fat ideology had such a hold on Americans that skeptics were dismissed. Only recently has evidence of a paradigm shift begun to surface, first with the challenge of the low-carbohydrate diet and then, with a more moderate approach, reflecting recent scientific knowledge about fats.

Here's the whole thing:
 
Has anyone read this? I'd be curious to know your thoughts! Please come back and reply once you've read the article!
 
Well there are a couple of things that fascinate me:
-The science behind low fat diets has always been weak.
-The government adopted a national nutritional plan based on said weak science, and it made Americans fatter.

I guess when you lived it... I was born in the '80s, so it was what I grew up on. To think that my formidable years were based on poor advice from government funded "scientists"... well it just makes me mad. It's why I'm so passionate about food now.
 
I haven't finished reading it, but so far... yeah, I already knew that the low fat science was pretty weak. I'm not sure if link this references it, but more interesting to me was the recent Harvard study that indicated that saturated fat from unprocessed meats was not associated with Diabetes and heart disease, but processed meats like bacon and sausage etc. had a high correlation to both. But since processed meats are high in saturated fat, and most studies just looked at saturated fat alone without separating out the source... it certainly explains some of the inconsistencies in results.

I still sometimes eat things with reduced or no fat, but mostly because I'm aiming for low calorie and high protein or fiber and those are more suited to my goal. Last week I got 37% of my calories from fat, so I don't worry that I'm hurting myself by eating low fat cottage cheese or non-fat cream cheese when it suits me though :D

I'm not sure it's 100% fair to say that the nutritional plans based on weak science are what made Americans fatter though. Even if it hadn't been for the low fat food, the availability of cheap, processed junk and the fact that you can pack so many calories into such a small space (And lets face it, processed food is a lot less likely to spoil quickly than fresh fruits & veggies, or even meat) would probably have had the same results with our without the low fat craze. There'd have been some other high calorie 'health' food craze...
 
Back
Top