Sport Here it is!!! Morning Cardio Debate......

Sport Fitness
I've seen on many occasions people say that you burn the same amount of fat/calories during morning cardio on an empty stomach as you do during any other time of day so I figured, lets see how this is determined.....

I will start off:

I am a FIRM believer that morning cardio on an empty stomach is MUCH more effective for burning fat than cardio after consuming a meal or cardio later in the day.

Here's why....This is from a website source sixpacknow.com

Early in the morning before you eat, your levels of muscle and liver glycogen (stored carbohydrates) are low. If you eat dinner at 7 p.m. and you eat breakfast at 7 a.m., that's 12 hours without food. During this 12-hour overnight fast, your levels of glycogen slowly decline to provide glucose for various bodily functions that go on even while you sleep. As a result, you wake up in the morning with depleted glycogen and lower blood sugar - the optimum environment for burning fat instead of carbohydrate. How much more fat you'll burn is uncertain, but some studies have suggested that up to 300% more fat is burned when cardio is done in a fasted, glycogen-depleted state.

So how exactly does this work? It's quite simple, really. Carbohydrate (glycogen) is your body's primary and preferred energy source. When your primary fuel source is in short supply, this forces your body to tap into its secondary or reserve energy source; body fat. If you do cardio immediately after eating a meal, you'll still burn fat, but you'll burn less of it because you'll be burning off the carbohydrates you ate first. You always burn a combination of fat and carbohydrate for fuel, but depending on when you exercise, you can burn a greater proportion of fat relative to carbohydrate.

The second benefit you'll get from early morning cardio sessions is what I call the "after burn" effect. When you do a cardio session in the morning, you not only burn fat during the session, but you also continue to burn fat at an accelerated rate after the workout. Why? Because an intense session of cardiovascular exercise can keep your metabolism elevated for hours after the session is over. If you do cardio at night, you will still burn fat during the session, so you definitely benefit from it. However, night time cardio fails to take advantage of the "after burn" effect because your metabolism drops like a ton of bricks as soon as you go to sleep. While you sleep, your metabolic rate is slower than any other time of the day.

Let's hear what everyone else thinks about this topic.
 
Last edited:
"Cardio timing: The Secret to Burning up to 300% Faster"


"A.M. Fat Burn"


"2-Ways to Burn Fat quickly"


In general, I have no problem with working out in the a.m. first thing or doing evening workouts....or both. I am a night person (practically a vampire..so as much as I am for a.m. I have hel# to be an early enough riser..unless I'm in job..aka panic/money mode that requires early rising) so I've found myself doing yoga and that sort at night. When I was gymming I used to try to get in as early as they opened...1) becasue of less people 2) the morning excercise (which actually began with the commute..."pre-cardio") was great for waking me up, cardio, body...and kept me in tune the whole day. I've done excercising at all hours...but I'd say a.m. is great and so healthy for all sorts of reasons. Evening is nice and beneficial as well. However, while I can can compare them ..I don't compete them since are dealing with a different set of body and environmental circumstances. Then again some people have more time and flexibility on their hands than others where a.m. might not really work out. Yet, in the night workout going to sleep or napping right after to me would seem counter productive just like having heavy breakfast after workout..with no where else to burn it off...e.g: a.m workout, eat hearty and go to a computer job or something sedentary. I guess if eating "hearty" is a big bowl of salad or fruit...or if its something thats not fatty; hearty but filling it might not be so detrimental in the sedentary situation. On another level theres the perspective of certain body types/combinations of types (e.g health oriented studies of ayurveda, chinese)... thats another subject in a way...but its just a thought to say
some folks would probably benefit from a noon based workout others a.m. and so forth or a mix depending on the person.

Kylee
 
Last edited:
I think to say that you just wake up glycogen depleted is a bit off. Since the bodies primary source of energy while at rest is fat, we're utilizing more fat than carbs while sleeping. To say that if you wake up in a fasted state and jump on some cardio you'll burn fat is a bit simplistic and does not take into account the time factor involved to get into aerobic activity.

Something else to consider is with someone like me...I get 6 hours of sleep and consume food before going to sleep.

Unless someone is utilizing a low carb lifestyle, they should still have carb reserves.

Then again, what type of intensity are we talking about? If we're doing higher intensity, then we might have shifted into anaerobic activity, in which case the body will only burn carbs.

Anyway, I went and dug this article up.
http://www.t-nation.com/readTopic.do?id=835725
 
I can see the logic behind the theory although, evolution makes a good point - I too eat late at night before bed. From a personal point of view though, morning cardio would need to be scientifically proven to be at least twenty times as effective for me to crowbar myself out of my nice warm bed before I absolutely have to!!

(I am not much of a morning person ;)) and just to highlight how lazy I really am, I actually have a cross-trainer by my bed but, I only ever use it in the evenings!
 
Last edited:
my dad used to be a semi pro boxer back in the day, he used to get up at 5am every day monday to sunday and go on a 45minute run both him and his trainer used to swear by it and he looked amazing 11% bodyfat at 245lbs 6ft tall
 
It's like I said before, you don't just wake up, go jogging, and suddenly you're in fat burning mode. The debate really ceases when you take that burning over all calories is much more important; we have to target not having a caloric surplus or it won't matter if we do just burn fat...it'll come right back on. AKA:it's all about burning the calories.

The other consideration is that we are always helped by all three of our energy systems (even if it's just a little) and then we risk burning muscle which should be the further goal in our mind.

And lastly, unless the person just enjoys treking 45 minutes to an hour plus for cardio, they're going to be miserable and then add being starved on top of that (note: being in starvation mode is horrible on the body) makes for a miserable experience. I'm sorry, this is slightly not part of the debate, but my money goes to non-fasted state intervals.
 
from alwyn cosgrove

FASTED CARDIO

Are you ****ing kidding me? Seriously, are you ****ing kidding me? Why are we even talking about this?

Let's take two twins, both 200lbs, both doing the same training program, taking the same supplements, and following the same nutrition plan in the hopes of getting lean.

One difference, though: one of them eats 2 eggs and does 30 minutes of cardio three days per week. The other does 30 minutes of cardio, three days per week and THEN eats 2 eggs.

So what's the magical difference in terms of fat loss after six months? Drum roll please...

I'll tell you — no ****ing difference.

However, whenever you bring up this question we get a ton of responses saying, "This is exactly the information I needed!". Oh **** off. The reason you are still fat is because you couldn't decide to do cardio on an empty stomach or not?

30 minutes of steady state cardio will burn about 300 calories. Three times per week – 900 calories. Add that up for 26 weeks and we get a whopping: 23,400 calories.

Or 6.6 lbs of fat.

In six months.

If doing it fasted, burned 30% more (which it doesn't), you're looking at another 2lbs of fat in that same six month period.

Or an additional 0.07 pounds per week.

And for those of you who say – I do fasted cardio but I have a small scoop of protein first, then you're NOT DOING IT FASTED THEN, ARE YOU?

Fat people finish marathons all the time. Aerobic training doesn't do a hell of a lot for real world fat loss. Even if you're hungry.
 
christian finn wrote an article on this and summed it up with

Carbohydrate, particularly if it has a high glycemic index, consumed 45-210 minutes before exercise will reduce the number of fat calories your body burns for energy. But when carbohydrate is taken during exercise — especially intense exercise — the effect on fat oxidation is relatively small.

However, the extent to which this affects fat loss over a period of several weeks or months is open to debate. If you can't face the idea of exercise in a fasted state, or you hate exercise first thing in the morning, the benefits probably aren't significant enough to outweigh the drawbacks.

Still, if you're having a hard time losing fat, exercise first thing in the morning in a fasted state might help you shift those last stubborn 5 or 10 pounds. If you don't like the hungry feeling that can accompany morning exercise, or you feel like you're running out of energy after 20-30 minutes, then try using some whey protein (either alone or mixed with some carbohydrate) during exercise.
 
Back
Top