At the moment, I'm not engaged in any special diet/ weightlifting program, but was considering doing the research and starting one sometime in the near future.
As I said, I haven't taken a legitimate, fully educated attempt at this yet, and therefore aren't fully aware of my limits and capabilities, but from the outside looking in, I think I would be able to handle a serious weightlifting program. A calory-counting diet, on the other hand, I'm not so sure of. It seems to me something like that could drive me absolutely insane.
I can fully understand something like that for a bodybuilder, but for a college student like me who'd be happy to gain a mere 10 pounds over the course of a year or so?
It looks like it involves so much effort and is so time-consuming - finding out the exact amounts of each nutrient in each item of food you consume, keeping a schedule of what to eat and when, and in exactly what amounts, using a food scale to measure out exactly what you need, making sure you get around to each meal at the right time, making sure you vary your sources of each nutrient, learning to cook all those new things............
Does it really need to be that precise in all cases? What if something unexpected comes up and I'm forced to eat McDonald's on a certain day? I can hardly count on adhering to such a strict program at all times even if I do put everything I have into it.
Doesn't the nutritional content of a certain item of food vary a lot in real life anyway? For example, can one really expect an apple to have even approximately the same amount of fiber and carbohydrates as the one he ate yesterday? It seems the number of calories you actually consume could be so far off what you plan to consume no matter what. Would it be more practical to count the number of SERVINGS of each type of food instead?
Or is it best to try to plan down to the last calory in all cases, since that way you minimize your margin of error?
I was planning to buy a few books to do the bulk of my research, such as Beyond Brawn or something, but I'm afraid a lot of them would be more geared toward serious bodybuilder types and present diet guidelines I couldn't possibly hope to adhere to to a good enough extent. I'm afraid they might also be geared more toward different body types - i.e., not for rail-thin hardgainers like me.
I'm mainly wondering if I can approach the diet aspect in a somewhat flexible way, since my goal is basically simply to start putting on mass and continue to put on mass over whatever time period it takes, or if this is more of a do-it-exactly-right-or don't-even-bother type situation.
A bodybuilder I'm not, and I'm not looking to reach any goal by a certain deadline; i just want to put on weight.
Sorry for the long post, and any help is appreciated.
As I said, I haven't taken a legitimate, fully educated attempt at this yet, and therefore aren't fully aware of my limits and capabilities, but from the outside looking in, I think I would be able to handle a serious weightlifting program. A calory-counting diet, on the other hand, I'm not so sure of. It seems to me something like that could drive me absolutely insane.
I can fully understand something like that for a bodybuilder, but for a college student like me who'd be happy to gain a mere 10 pounds over the course of a year or so?
It looks like it involves so much effort and is so time-consuming - finding out the exact amounts of each nutrient in each item of food you consume, keeping a schedule of what to eat and when, and in exactly what amounts, using a food scale to measure out exactly what you need, making sure you get around to each meal at the right time, making sure you vary your sources of each nutrient, learning to cook all those new things............
Does it really need to be that precise in all cases? What if something unexpected comes up and I'm forced to eat McDonald's on a certain day? I can hardly count on adhering to such a strict program at all times even if I do put everything I have into it.
Doesn't the nutritional content of a certain item of food vary a lot in real life anyway? For example, can one really expect an apple to have even approximately the same amount of fiber and carbohydrates as the one he ate yesterday? It seems the number of calories you actually consume could be so far off what you plan to consume no matter what. Would it be more practical to count the number of SERVINGS of each type of food instead?
Or is it best to try to plan down to the last calory in all cases, since that way you minimize your margin of error?
I was planning to buy a few books to do the bulk of my research, such as Beyond Brawn or something, but I'm afraid a lot of them would be more geared toward serious bodybuilder types and present diet guidelines I couldn't possibly hope to adhere to to a good enough extent. I'm afraid they might also be geared more toward different body types - i.e., not for rail-thin hardgainers like me.
I'm mainly wondering if I can approach the diet aspect in a somewhat flexible way, since my goal is basically simply to start putting on mass and continue to put on mass over whatever time period it takes, or if this is more of a do-it-exactly-right-or don't-even-bother type situation.
A bodybuilder I'm not, and I'm not looking to reach any goal by a certain deadline; i just want to put on weight.
Sorry for the long post, and any help is appreciated.