Calculating Your Ideal Body Weight

Doc Bunkum

New member
When it comes to weight loss, invariably you hear statements like "I need to lose 40 lbs” or “I want to get down to 150 lbs” (or some such number). Where did those numbers come from anyhow? How did you arrive at the goal of losing 40 lbs? Or how do you know if 150 lbs is a totally realistic figure for you?

That's the problem with using BMI charts or height/weight tables. The figures they use are based on the "average" of a large group of people. They might not apply at all to you. Everyone is unique. These charts don't consider your genetics, bone density, hereditary factors, or current level of musculature, to name only a few factors that can make a large difference.

So how then do you select a realistic goal weight then?

Well, there is a method. You’ve likely not heard this before. And if you search the net you’re not likely too find it either because this method is not generally well known.

It’s called the Target Weight Formula and is based on your body composition, not on body weight which is relatively meaningless.

The first thing you need to do is to determine your current body composition. It’s a simple method to get this figure from a local gym or university that has a sports med program. Or get an inexpensive set of calipers for $20 from a place like Accu-Measure and do it yourself with a 5 point analysis. Forget those Tanita scales – they’re way off.

Accuracy isn’t as important as consistency. As long as the same person measures the same way every time, you can track changes over time.

Now let’s assume you weight 264 lbs and had the BCA done and found you were 43% body fat. That would mean you had 113 pounds of fat and conversely 151 lbs of lean.

So instead of picking a number out of the hat and deciding to drop 50 lbs to 214 as an immediate goal, you decide instead to lower your body fat from 43% to 35% as your first target. This 8% reduction should make noticeable gains in health and appearance.

So the question is, once you reach your goal of 35% body fat, what would your bodyweight be? Unless you work with numbers all day, that question will likely have you scratching your head.


But using the Target Weight Formula, you can easily find the answer.

It goes like this:

Target Weight = LBM (lean body mass) divided by (1 - desired body fat as a decimal)

Let’s translate all that into English!

We have the necessary numbers so let’s plug them into the formula. From the assumptions above…

TW = 151 (lean body mass) divided by (1 - .35 (35% - the target body fat % as a decimal)) = 232 lbs.

What this is saying is that if you lower your body fat to 35%, you should weigh in around 232 lbs on the scale. This is a healthy and realistic immediate goal to aim for. Once you lower your bf% to 35%, take a month to maintain and let your body stabilize and to learn new healthier eating habits.

At 232 lbs and 35% bf, your body composition now becomes 81 lbs fat, 151 lbs lean.

Then do another cycle. Set 30% as you next goal. Your bodyweight would then drop to…

Target Weight = LBM (lean body mass) divided by (1 - desired body fat as a decimal)

Target Weight = 151 divided by (1 - 30%) = 215 lbs.

At 30% body fat, your scale weight should now be in the 215 lb range.

Of course, with this method is the assumption that you’ll be exercising to “burn” fat with the goal of maintaining as much of your current lean mass as possible by using resistance exercise. This is the modern approach to losing weight.

You’ll be a lot healthier too losing fat rather than just pounds that the scale shows. Being healthy should be the primary goal of any fitness/weight loss program. Next time you have to lose “weight”, consider this method instead of the traditional “starving off the weight” way.
 
Ooookay.

So my body mass is close to 29%... That would mean I have 45 lbs of fat...

And 105 lbs of lean?

Damn.

Maybe I didn't do it right?

Oh... wait. You're really not supposed to be all lean, are you?

I really don't get this.

I think I will just shoot for a 124 lbs, a weight I used to be, and looked great at, and felt good at!
 
Well, at 124 lbs., unless you're a midget, your bf %age would likely be in the low to mid teens, which is where it should be, so you can just ignore the formula. :)
 
your bf %age would likely be in the low to mid teens, which is where it should be

That's pretty low for a girl, actually.

Your method came up with about the same goal weight I had in mind, once I picked a reasonable target body fat percentage. The downfall of your method, IMHO, is that you have to pick a reasonable target body fat percentage, and that's about the same slippery slope as picking a reasonable target weight. The only advantage is that most people don't have an irrational emotional attachment to body fat percentages. :)
 
I think it's good to suggest that people practice maintaining a weight in that losing weight can put a strain on the body. Maintenance cycles can also kill momentum.

I think most folks who come to this forum have a good idea of a target weight and are reasonable enough to reevaluate the goal based on how they look/feel when they near their target.
 
the easiest method I've seen is 100 lbs for 5 feet and 5 feet for every inch over that for females of normal bone structure... a little less for people with small bones and a litle more with people with larger bones... For males the number goes up a little

but paydirt's got it -go by what you see in the mirror...

shooting for a particular number can be frustrating - you might never get to that number again - go for what you see as no one except you will ever know what the scale says...

Look at the comments in the before and after forum- how many pictures get the comment - you don't look your weight - the scale number isn't really all that relavent.
 
target weights do have some merit, as long as it's not the be all and end all...

For me -it was something to aim for - it helped me with some direction...
 
Good point....

It's what most tend to focus all their attention on and this is where I see the problem.
 
agreed - I've seen a bunch of people on various sites want to get to their weight when they were a cheerleader in high school or captain of the varsity football team -- different time and place and a person might never get there again... doesnt mean they can't be better now.. but the weight is just a number.. it's the entire picture that matters...
 
the easiest method I've seen is 100 lbs for 5 feet and 5 feet for every inch over that for females of normal bone structure... a little less for people with small bones and a litle more with people with larger bones... For males the number goes up a little
.

That seems a wee bit light to me :S i'm 5'2 and small boned, so that means i'd be aiming for 110 pounds or less, but my sisters heavier than that and she's very skinny, if she was as thin as that we would worry.
 
I look at my mom. We're only sixteen years apart and we're the same height with the same proportions, me being 100 pounds bigger. We're both real short with big bones (not just an excuse, I mean like she has hunky knees and wrists) and muscular as the day is long without working out at all. So the way I figure it, I want to get down to somewhere a little bigger than her. She's teeeny-weenie at 130, so I think I'll look good at 135-140. This calculation does not hurt my brain and I don't have too spend a gajillion dollars on measuring do-dads to come up with it. ; - )
 
Back
Top