Body Fat %

We had this wellness screening here at work and some people came in and did a finger prick.. told us our cholest levels and bloop pressure, height, weight, useless BMI, and... body fat.. but it was taken by one of those machines that you just hold out in front of you. It said I was at 21.1.

Since, from what I know, those aren't very accurate, I had a trainer at my gym take it with calipers last night.. dude tells me my body fat is close to 27.8%!!!!!!! That can't be possible!!! Can it? (recent pic in avatar)

He then tried to sell me some fat burners :confused4:
 
There is no way your near that. Those machines are junk. I have one I know, and I'm also a trainer. It matters who takes the pinch test to. I see he wanted to sell you fat burners, tell you anything? You look fine :)
 
no way yer 27% sure women are naturally higher than men by a few % but...no..you are not that high. probably more like 13% to throw a number out based on your flat abs in the photo.
 
Yeah, of course you're not 27%. It's way hard to give an estimate without a full body shot though. I will say that most people underestimate women's body fat percentage. Most women that men would call lean/hot/etc are like in the 16-23% bodyfat range. I think alot of people have a hard time getting it out of their head that a woman's bodyfat level is much higher than a man's. A man would look pretty soft at 15-20% body fat but it's not so for a woman.

If you were like 13% that would be an AMAZING accomplishment. That is like athletic level of bodyfat. to get much lower would be fitness model level and not always safe to try and maintain. So look at yourself in the mirror? Do you think you are comparable to female athletes that you see on tv? If I had to guess by your ab picture and the fact that you are a fitness oriented woman I would say you are probably at 17-18% range.
 
No, I, in no way, would compare myself to female athletes!

That's kind of the range I was expecting.. 17% to 20%, but when he hit me with 27%, I freaked out for about half a second... until he started talking about fat burners.
 
Oh I also want to say that when I was at like 18% I had crazy defined abs. Honestly it was amazing and I remember my bf being like holy crap! Everone is different though and some women won't get abs until they are very low on the body fat scale. I'm very lucky in that I carry most of my fat in my butt and thighs. My stomach always looks fairly lean so that is why I would say that a full body shot is needed to truely assess bodyfat percentage.

Found a good chart on the percentages for females on this page:


Scroll down to underneath the truth. These numbers are very good numbers to go by.

Edit - Just read your reply. Pretty sleazy for someone to try and trick someone like that. I think this is a good thread though because I am fairly sick of 2 things:

1. Women freaking out and going "I'm 20% bodyfat?!?! Oh no!"

2. Skinny, flabby, eats a cupcake a day girls going "I'm like 9% body fat". Errrrr, no your not.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, forget those result. You might be 12% or 35%, whatever. Ask anyone on this board, you LOOK awesome. Those abs are ton, NO love handles. The arms are really nice. You look beautiful and FIT and amazing.
 
Next time you see him, tell him that he needs to start doing hte 9 point caliper test. There's no way you'll even get close to accurate unless you do 9 points. And then, if he sucks, the reading will still be off.

Oh! I'll be in Scarborough next weekend (18th). Whatcha doing that weekend?
 
Yeah....I wanna throw-in my 2-cents on this one for sure.

I'm a numbers guy....my bike riding involves miles, elevation & lots of data. I wear an HR-monitor and love the calorie-counter. So it should come as no surprise that I need some guage as a means to monitor & evaluate my weight-loss results.

My problem is that I hop on the scale and find no weight-loss...despite looking leaner. The answer was found when using the bodyfat calipers: I'd consistently lose bodyfat% but not always weight. Needless to say, we adopted the BF% as my means of judgement & evaluation.

Now, my nutritionist writes for Men's Health and he's all into everything fitness related. I can't recall his numbers, but there was a VAST difference bertween his own measured bodyfat% based on the water-tank, the fat calipers and even DEXA (Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) and even the units you hold in your hands or scales you step on. Results varied from 14.3% to 26.7% (or something like that). And the water-tank & DEXA, two of the most highly regarded methods, were vastly different in numbers, but as much as 6.5%

The water-tank can't take into consideration your hydration level, bone-density and a few other factors. The body-fat calipers only measure the subcutaneous fat under the skin and only at those exact locations being pinched (granted they have about 3-5 set locations that are supposed to give you an overall idea), the devices you hold only pass electricity through those parts of your body between the two points of contact and even DEXA was disappointing but perhaps the most accurate.


So while I turn to these numbers & measures for my precious data....they're all too often unreliable and frustrating. About the only thing I can take from the BF% calipers is that if the results show dropping numbers, I'm losing fat....at least on a subcutaneous level, as for the more important and health-related visceral fat...who knows.

It's all so frustrating, but in the end it still comes down to how you look & feel and more often then not we don't allow ourselves to be as happy as we should be with our bodies. Is it not our strongest ability to focus on what remains to be lost or what flaw we find then to celebrate our strengths? I'm absolutely at odds with this stubborn kidney flab coming around the back of my waist...and yet I see models in magazines and EVERY MMA wrestler with their back muffin going on. That's why I HATE cycling shorts or jammers; they cut into your skin because they're tight and I just can't stand having that skin bulging just above the fabric. And ya know what....I just won't ever have that rock-perfect body unless I eat about 800 calories per day, endure endless hunger....I just don't think the human body, or perhaps my body, is comfortable at that level of intense deprivation...so it is what it is. :eating: :D
 
Compared to your picture, I'm pretty much the same size as you and it came at just under 27% as well. so im a little relieved after reading these replys...
 
I would be skeptic of what they tell you. It could be a sales pitch to get you worried for no reason. I remember reading that it's fairly common line for 20%-30% range. But yeah, I think anyone would tell you look way good.
 
Back
Top