BMI Questions and a bit of an intro...

CDNTech

New member
Is there a way to factor in muscle mass or grandular tissue vs. fatty tissue in your bmi?

I was 140lbs (5'7") in high school which put me at a bmi of 22. I was also anorexic with every single one of my ribs showing, hip bones stuck out and couldn't get myself to go any smaller. I also was blessed (?) with 34F breasts from my mother... which I'm pretty sure attributed to some of the reason I couldn't go any smaller on the scale.

Fast forward to my wedding two years later and I was 160lbs (25 BMI), which technically puts me in the overweight category. However, I was all lean muscle and looked *really* good... still with those 34F's. I was working out 5 times/week, had a very healthy diet and did competitive figure skating.

Fast forward again to two children and toxemia/pre-eclampsia in both pregnancies and I ballooned up to 260lbs (9 months preggo weight). I lost 40lbs within the first two months of giving birth (both times) and then slowly lost another 20lbs over the first year each time.

I am currently at 201lbs (have lost 14lbs since Sep. 1) and working towards that 160lbs number again. My short term goal is to be 191lbs by Nov. 18th. I have a consultation for a breast reduction (currently 34I) on that date and want to be below a 30 bmi. I should be having surgery by April and want to hit 180lbs by then.

I think I'm being realistic... doing WW (easier than counting calories for me), but I don't consider it a diet... I consider it a lifestyle change. This is how I'll be eating for the rest of my life... not that I've ever eaten unhealthy (other than anorexic high school period), but I've stepped it up and am being very conscientious of portion size and water intake. I am also working out 5 times per week (1/2 hour cardio, 1/2 hour strength).

I'm having a bit (okay... a lot) of trouble with my back as the weight comes off... my ribcage has shrunk 2" and my breasts have not shrunk at all (which is how I suspect it's mostly grandular tissue and not fatty tissue in there). My ribcage is currently 32" and my bust is 46"... which explains the sore back. :(

All of that background, sorry... I'm really trying hard not to worry about the number and just worry about how I look, but I still want that BMI to be in the healthy range (especially before surgery) *and* look healthy on me. I'm just not sure if that's totally possible given my history?

Is glandular tissue ever factored into a BMI or how does that work? I know there's no way my breasts can weigh an extra 20lbs due to glandular tissue... is there glandular tissue found elsewhere in the body that could attribute to this?

I tried looking for stickies on this... but the search function is not recognizing BMI as a search term. I figured if I posted here, you long timers could tell me like it is and point me in the direction of correct information.

Thanks, Jen
 
Is there a way to factor in muscle mass or grandular tissue vs. fatty tissue in your bmi?
Nope -that's why BMI isn't the best indicator for healthy weight... if you're obese it gives you a muchbetter range to get out of -but for people who are closer to a 'healthy' weight - bmi isn't a good indicator
 
Is there any 'scale' to factor a healthy weight or is it just basically how you look/feel?

Hi,

Personally I use BMI and Body Fat % as a guide, but if you feel good and you like what you see, then surely thats the result we are all looking for?

Im sure others might feel different, but thats how I see it :)

:seeya:
 
Is there any 'scale' to factor a healthy weight or is it just basically how you look/feel?

The Oprah Diet of the Week doctors - were all about waist management and the waist to hip ratio (google it for what the results mean) it's really abouy dividing your waist measurement by your hip meaasurement and that number can (but not always) is the indicator of potential for problems..

as for healthy weight -it's really about how you feel -can you walk up a few flights of stairs without needing oxygen - can you do various tasks without feeling like you've run a marathon...
 
Beware BMI

In my opinion, I wouldn't use the BMI at all to measure your progress. The BMI is an average of a persons healthy weight based on their height. However, most of us are not average! According to the BMI, Micheal Jordan, Brad Pitt, and Arnold Schwarzenegger (not sure on the spelling there, but you know who I'm talking about) are ALL overweight. Worry about being the best you can be, as opposed to comparing yourself to some mythical average person.
 
Thanks everyone. I can't believe I forgot about body fat %... that's what I used to go off of when I was 160lbs (which is why I know I like the 160lbs number on me). You can't really be out of the 'scale' with body fat %, right?

I can run a flight of stairs (I run after two kids all day long ;)), but there's always room for improvement. I'll just keep truckin' along. Thanks again. :)

ETA: I just went and calculated my body fat (have a WW scale that does that). 140lbs was 7% body fat. :ack2: No wonder everyone thought I looked unhealthy (dumb teenager). :( 160lbs puts me at 18%... which is probably why I really looked good. :D

I'm aiming for 170lbs or 23% body fat... can you tell I'm totally a numbers girl? :D So... 30lbs to go and I can do this. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top