![[Focus]1](https://www.fitness.com/forum/data/avatars/m/1207/1207022.jpg?1452890744){kind=avatar}
[Focus]1
New member
Everything I've seen insists you stop and do the break-out after 4 weeks, but I have yet to see any sort of justification of that admonition. Good/bad/catastrophic/awesome idea, and why?
My reasoning:
2 straight months of velocity fits my goals better - "Drop as much bodyfat (and, less importantly, as little muscle) as possible by August 25." If I have to do a break-out and sit at maintenance for two weeks before school, I feel like I'll be "wasting" the month of August. Besides, I love the way I feel on this diet, except for being hungry all the time.
The question is not whether I want to do it (I sure as hell don't), or whether I can (I will trade suffering for results all damn year if I have to), or whether I need to (obviously not) but whether I should. And, once again, why.
Thanks!
My reasoning:
2 straight months of velocity fits my goals better - "Drop as much bodyfat (and, less importantly, as little muscle) as possible by August 25." If I have to do a break-out and sit at maintenance for two weeks before school, I feel like I'll be "wasting" the month of August. Besides, I love the way I feel on this diet, except for being hungry all the time.
The question is not whether I want to do it (I sure as hell don't), or whether I can (I will trade suffering for results all damn year if I have to), or whether I need to (obviously not) but whether I should. And, once again, why.
Thanks!